New Object ‘ED138’ Found Beyond Pluto — 5ch Reacts: ‘We Already Have a Bunch of Dwarf Planets’

From our other sites

The story

According to a CNN report from October 29, astronomers have discovered an object orbiting beyond Pluto’s orbit, provisionally named “ED138.” It’s estimated to be roughly 600-1,500 km in diameter and could potentially become a recognized dwarf planet. On 5ch, while many posters explained that this is a separate object from the undiscovered “Planet Nine” (believed to be about 10 times Earth’s mass), the more common reaction was a cool-headed “We don’t get what’s supposed to be surprising — there are already several dwarf planets beyond Pluto, like Eris, Makemake, and Haumea,” with many questioning whether the news was even novel.

Published 10/29 (Thu) 14:00

CNN.co.jp

(CNN) — Astronomers have discovered an object within the solar system that may be a new dwarf planet. Orbiting beyond Pluto’s orbit, the object has been provisionally named “ED138.”

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

4AnonymousOct 29, 2026 18:10
So this is separate from Planet Nine, right?
32AnonymousOct 31, 2026 04:40
Re: #4
> ED138 is estimated to be 600-1,500 km in diameter.

Okay, thread's over, everybody go home!
5AnonymousOct 29, 2026 18:43
Yeah, this is different from the so-called Planet Nine.
This new dwarf planet candidate is only about 600-1,500 km across, not massive enough to affect other objects' orbits
(it was found purely through optical observation).
Planet Nine, on the other hand, is said to be about 10 times Earth's mass.
6AnonymousOct 29, 2026 18:55
It's a trans-Neptunian object.
Expect a lot more of these to turn up.
7AnonymousOct 29, 2026 19:13
Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, dotten kororin~ (nonsense rhyme from the old Japanese mnemonic song for the planet order)

So it's Planet Kororin!
8AnonymousOct 29, 2026 19:46
I like 'em big…
9AnonymousOct 29, 2026 19:58
Nah, there are already tons of dwarf planets.
11AnonymousOct 29, 2026 22:02
Lucifer, huh?
12AnonymousOct 29, 2026 22:03
Reading the article, it sounds like they didn't actually confirm the dwarf planet through optical observation — they just inferred its existence from the motion of other bodies. That's not really a "discovery."
If it really exists and isn't some unusually weird object, optical observation should be possible.
We have space telescopes now, so it should be clearly visible.
They should've confirmed it before writing the article.
16AnonymousOct 30, 2026 01:33
Re: #12
Actually, no — apparently it was found as a moving point of light across multiple photos of the sky.
Its position is already known now, so anyone can observe it.
It's tilted quite far from the solar system's ecliptic plane, and it probably doesn't have enough mass to affect other bodies.
13AnonymousOct 29, 2026 22:27
> Possibility of a new dwarf planet beyond Pluto

Eris, Makemake, and Haumea are ALL already dwarf planets beyond Pluto. What is this dumb news story???
14AnonymousOct 29, 2026 22:33
Ah, so it's separate from Planet Nine. Okay, that's actually news then.
15AnonymousOct 30, 2026 01:08
Forget the dwarf planets, let's hurry up and find Planet Nine already.
17AnonymousOct 30, 2026 04:23
Poor Neptune.
19AnonymousOct 30, 2026 08:49
Haiyo Planet… (a pun — 廃用/haiyō "disuse," 肺葉/haiyō "lung lobe," and 胚葉/haiyō "germ layer" are all homophones)
20AnonymousOct 30, 2026 09:37
Still, I don't really get how dozens of objects can be arranged in this double-helix-like orbital structure, each with a different relative velocity, yet appear to keep their positions relative to each other — I guess it's because the whole system is moving together as a set.
21AnonymousOct 30, 2026 09:58
Someone explain what's supposed to be surprising here.
22AnonymousOct 30, 2026 11:21
Re: #21
Because they discovered a new dwarf planet.
23AnonymousOct 30, 2026 12:19
Re: #18
> One of the conditions for being classified a planet is that it has gravitationally swept its orbital neighborhood clear of other bodies.
That definition was set 20 years ago, but it's way too outdated now that we've discovered so many exoplanets.
That's because we now know planetary orbits aren't static the way they used to be imagined — they shift dynamically over time.
Our solar system, neatly arranged with the heaviest planet (Jupiter) at the center and mass tapering off both inward and outward, turns out to be the exception rather than the typical case.
24AnonymousOct 30, 2026 18:09
Wasn't it always said there are tons of objects out beyond Pluto? That's exactly why Pluto got demoted to dwarf planet in the first place.
25AnonymousOct 30, 2026 19:20
Re: #24
Exactly, so this doesn't really have much news value.
26AnonymousOct 30, 2026 19:51
At this point it's really just a question of how you define "planet."
27AnonymousOct 30, 2026 20:05
So you're saying fewer objects meet the dwarf-planet criteria than expected?
30AnonymousOct 30, 2026 22:13
Re: #27
Turns out a lot of them orbit on paths that have nothing to do with the ecliptic plane, which has made them hard to find.
28AnonymousOct 30, 2026 20:24
Wasn't there talk a couple years back about changing the definition of "planet" again? I wonder what ever happened with that.
29AnonymousOct 30, 2026 20:28
I genuinely don't know what part of this I'm supposed to find surprising.
31AnonymousOct 30, 2026 23:40
Small objects orbiting way out there probably just get knocked off course by the slightest external force or perturbation, or else they're objects that happened to pass near the solar system once, bled off some energy, and ended up weakly bound to it.

If there were an object with an extremely elongated elliptical orbit and an orbital period of a billion or even ten billion years around the sun, it's questionable whether we could even recognize it as a member of the solar system. And if it picked up energy from somewhere, its elliptical orbit could turn into a parabolic one and it could fly off, never to return — but even if that happened, would it still count as part of the solar system? (Kind of like an older brother who ran away from home.)
40AnonymousOct 31, 2026 16:47
Re: #31
There's also the gravity of nearby stars to factor in, so I doubt a stable orbit lasting hundreds of millions of years is even possible, right?
34AnonymousOct 31, 2026 05:32
The sun's gravity is just too strong!
35AnonymousOct 31, 2026 13:36
Nah, it's not really that surprising — now if an amateur had discovered it, that'd be something.
36AnonymousOct 31, 2026 13:57
The sun's pull is just too strong!
37AnonymousOct 31, 2026 14:13
Just smash Pluto and Charon together into one planet and boom, reinstated!
38AnonymousOct 31, 2026 14:52
● Pluto:
"Hey now, I even appeared in Space Battleship Yamato! There's even an anime where the main character shares my name (Pluto)!
So why the heck did I get kicked out of the solar system's planets? At least make me an 'honorary planet,' come on!
You stubborn blockheads at the astronomical society!"

Background and Key Points of This Discussion

Under the International Astronomical Union’s (IAU) 2006 redefinition, Pluto was demoted to dwarf planet status for “not having gravitationally cleared other bodies from its orbital neighborhood.” Since then, objects in the same class — Eris, Makemake, Haumea, and others — have been found one after another, and the thread reflected that history: plenty of posters pointed out that there are already plenty of dwarf planets beyond Pluto, with a cool reaction that this new ED138 find is just more of the same and not especially surprising. That said, it is clearly distinct from the undiscovered “Planet Nine,” believed to be roughly 10 times Earth’s mass — and unlike a mass-based inference, ED138, a small body estimated at 600-1,500 km across, was directly observed as a moving point of light across multiple photographs. Its existence wasn’t inferred from gravitational effects on other bodies, and its position has already been pinned down, so the criticism that “this is just an estimate, not a real discovery” doesn’t strictly hold up. The thread’s core debate ended up being a mix of misunderstandings about how dwarf planets are defined and what counts as a “discovery.”

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Science News+) thread “[Space] Astronomers Make Surprising Discovery, Possible New Dwarf Planet Beyond Pluto.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *