From our other sites
The story
A thread on a gaming board debated the reputation of the Xenoblade series. Sparked by a post claiming “If it weren’t for 3, the whole series would be a masterpiece,” users discussed the merits of 1 and 2’s individual scenarios, complaints about 3’s story pacing and dialogue, and differing reactions overseas. The thread saw criticism that 3’s narrative structure was “rushed” and “wordy” clash with calls to judge the series as a whole, and the conversation eventually branched out into character design trends and Nintendo’s IP strategy behind the series.
What people said
X: Strong personality, one of a kind
2: A classic, red-blooded story
The biggest reason it leaves a bad impression is the bittersweet-ending vibe of the presentation, and above all how wordy the characters' text — or rather, their dialogue — gets.
Especially Noah.
Honestly the ending is just under-explained and crammed in at a rushed pace, so you end up going "wait, what?" — but if you sort it out later with the lore in mind, it does hold together to some degree.
What really ruins the game is the back half, where the whole "exchange of lives" theme that's supposed to be the main point ends up meaningless, plus stress-inducing garbage scenario bits like the long-winded fat guy's flashback and the sloppy jailbreak plan.
Even XDE chapter 13 handles the "life for life" theme more properly.
Guess it's free to dream the impossible dream that it's popular overseas.
It's honestly scary that their attitude toward the game hasn't changed in 10 years — that only happens if you've refused to take in any new information at all.
Brings back memories of them being so absorbed in bashing Xenoblade Chronicles X that they were caught totally off guard by Splatoon's massive hit, lol
That's actually true — that "Whatchamacallit 33" game (i.e. Clair Obscur: Expedition 33) also went over well overseas because it's got a movie-like story.
For you guys entertainment means manga and anime, but over there movies are the main entertainment, so the tastes are just different.
In fact, arguments in Xeno-related threads actually come with people bringing proper in-universe evidence to back their points, rather than just being emotional slap-fights.
And above all, the person on the other side isn't one guy pretending to be several.
Before you go knocking Xeno, you should be hyping up Tales, Kiseki (Trails), or Marvel instead.
Sure, that's true for threads made now, but people were saying this exact thing nonstop back during the DLC promo period too, lol
If it were a bash thread for those other series, sure, but praise or chit-chat threads probably just don't last and the thread falls off the board.
Re: #61
Same goes for Fire Emblem, but having Nintendo's backing is a real strength.
The scale is completely different, but maybe something like CDPR, which gets state support, is a closer comparison.
What's actually worrying is that pitches for other IPs just don't get approved at all.
Feels like Nintendo's gone into turtle mode.
Like how plain the characters are.
FE Banshi's character buzz has been getting better and better ever since its first reveal, so maybe it's the same story for Genesis depending on what comes next?
Honestly I think the characters are plain in every entry except 2.
Say what you want, but 2 had a ton of character designs prepared, so it stood out.
2's character designs were just aimed squarely at kids — the Xenoblade series is basically plain-looking otherwise.
Each Blade's events are thin
There are too many Blades you never use
And yet 3's Hero content was made specifically in response to that feedback.
The people who keep endlessly whining "I wanted more of what 2 did!"
lost out to the people who actually gave the developers proper feedback.
Was "the Blade art lacks unity" actually a complaint people had?
I thought it was good that each artist brought their own distinct style.
And that's exactly why it's no good — they went and made unhinged stuff like Ethel's storyline, with its ethics-free resurrection and life-span-shortening nonsense.
Background and Key Points of This Discussion
The Xenoblade series is an RPG developed by Monolith Soft and published by Nintendo since the first title in 2010; the third entry, released in 2022, has drawn mixed reactions compared to the first two games over its character banter and story pacing. The “overseas reception” discussed in the thread isn’t backed by concrete sales data — it’s based on subjective opinions drawn from individual reviews and impressions, with no numerical evidence presented. Also, Expedition 33, brought up as a point of comparison, is a 2025 RPG from an unrelated company with no connection to the Xenoblade series. While Xenoblade continues to receive new entries as one of Nintendo’s flagship IPs, the thread also voiced the view that pitches for new titles in other Nintendo-originated IPs have a harder time getting approved — reflecting an underlying interest in the series’ position within Nintendo as a whole.
*This article was compiled by excerpting and summarizing the 5ch (Hardware/Industry, aka Geha) thread “If it weren’t for Xenoblade 3, you could call every entry in the series a god-tier masterpiece — such a shame.”
Leave a Reply