From our other sites
The story
On October 16, Alliance Arts announced it is scrapping the general public release of the demo for its PC game “PUKEY GODDESS SHOT TRICK,” originally planned for October 19, and switching instead to a limited online demo session for selected participants. The company cited concerns that AI and similar tools could be used to quickly imitate the demo’s visuals and content and put out copycat games before the full release, as well as the difficulty of managing playthrough videos. On 5ch, while some argued that opt-outs from AI training should be made even stronger, others pointed out that this game itself resembles other titles, sparking a broader debate about where to draw the line between manual imitation and AI-driven imitation, and about the structural problem where whoever releases first gets treated as “the original.”
On October 16, Alliance Arts announced it is canceling the general public release of the demo for its PC game “PUKEY GODDESS SHOT TRICK” and switching instead to a limited online demo session for selected participants. The decision stems from concern that, using the demo as a basis, works imitating the game’s visuals and content via AI and similar tools could be released before the full game ships.
The demo had originally been scheduled for release on October 19. Among the reasons for canceling the public release is also the difficulty of managing the posting and streaming of playthrough videos. The company reportedly planned to release it under certain restrictions, but concluded that proper management wasn’t feasible under its current operational setup.
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
That's basically a human right at this point.
of that one where a pig plays Russian roulette.
But if it comes to this, maybe my dream timeline of a new Dark Souls dropping every year until we hit Dark Souls 20 could actually happen.
We'd have to dig through an ocean of low-effort garbage to find it, though.
AI, evolve faster!
Digging through a pile of mass-produced, unbalanced AI Dark Souls clones to find something decent sounds like pure torture…
In the end, as the bad currency piles up, people start avoiding even the legit soulslikes, and nothing survives except the trusted original.
You can't even release something like this anywhere but Steam to begin with.
Kind of has the same vibe as when Palworld itself said it welcomes Palworld-likes.
If you've got even part of the source material, AI can fill in the rest.
Watching someone recreate FF6's story as an AI-generated anime made me wonder — even if Square Enix has no plans to monetize that themselves, is it really okay to just let this slide?
"Got made."
"Gets leaked."
"Incident."
"Can fill in the rest."
…Why are you phrasing all of this like it's a bad thing?
the original ends up looking like it copied the AI.
That's exactly why they can't even release a demo anymore.
Nothing's going to change unless this actually happens and a court sets a precedent, but for small studios — let alone solo indies — even filing a lawsuit is a massive burden.
You'd end up too busy to make games at all.
Early access would be the last thing on your mind.
Was that just good timing? Also, they both started out quietly.
Ripoffs back then were made by hand, and copying by hand takes time,
so there was enough of a head start to get recognized as the original.
These days, though, the knockoff launches basically at the same time.
but one made with AI doesn't.
The process is different, but you're doing the same thing either way.
It's not fine — that's literally why Palworld got sued.
Back then, people only copied a game after it already hit big, so the original never got buried — if anything, it worked as free promotion.
With AI, the knockoff steals the buzz and makes the original feel stale before it's even out.
That's a pretty different situation.
Then again, entries to the Hayakawa SF Contest (a Japanese sci-fi literary award) reportedly doubled year-over-year too.
If you look at it as an era where anyone finally gets a shot at becoming the creator they always dreamed of being, using AI isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Hard to say.
Creation isn't something you can just reproduce on demand — that's exactly why even manga artists only get called "the real deal" after landing two hits.
I guess the ones who survive will be whoever can use AI well, still put themselves into the work, and still make something everyone actually finds fun.
If it's a ripoff of a ripoff, getting copied yourself doesn't really sting.
But having something you poured your heart and soul into get stolen — that's rough.
since it becomes much easier for producers and directors to just force their own taste through.
I bet there are already quite a few people suffering through this, lol.
First off, once some idiot gets the idea that AI saves time, deadlines get crushed.
Then there's no time left to even check what's actually been made.
In the end, nobody even knows what they're building anymore.
Well, if you're just making something like a business app with nothing but mechanical features, maybe that's fine.
But for actual creative work, it's unthinkable not to look closely at what you've made.
If people in that field get their time squeezed like this, it's going to end in disaster.
This isn't some throwaway short drama for Chinese phones, after all.
These days live-service games just keep repeating the same loop: "copy an existing game for one event → by the next event that content is unplayable anyway, so the copied parts are already gone" lol.
It's basically a criminal business model of sorts.
But for indies it's unclear, and since it's not same-day action, the damage could end up pretty severe.
That's exactly the thing that'll get abused — spamming AI-generated takedown reports against the original, I mean.
Since the AI version gets released first,
the copy ends up being treated as the original.
it's the original that gets taken down.
That's not gonna happen.
The AI side is the one releasing first, you know?
Developer: "Our in-development trailer went viral, we'll release in six months."
↓
AI [side]: "We're releasing in one month, demo drops right away too."
This is already happening.
There's no such thing as "the original" anymore.
Bottom line up front: a scenario where "AI decides on its own to move up the release date and drop a demo" is not something that happens in actual game development.
This story is a meme (joke post) commonly seen on social media (especially X/former Twitter) that exaggerates or satirizes "how far future AI dev environments might evolve," or a joke modeled on a specific hypothetical game-dev scenario.
Here's a 3-point breakdown of why this couldn't happen in reality, and why jokes like this go viral.
—snipped—
Guess you don't get it unless someone spells it out as "a developer who used AI to rip people off," huh?
Before criticizing someone else, fix the sloppy exaggeration in your own writing.
Unlike big companies, they can use AI as much as they want.
Just like how director and programmer are separate roles,
the person who's good at coming up with ideas isn't necessarily the person who's good at implementation.
These days the "implementation" part basically just becomes "being good at using AI,"
but even so, people who can do both well are still pretty rare.
Background and Key Points of This Debate
The backdrop here is a real and growing trend: people using generative AI to quickly build similar games based on demos and playthrough videos published on platforms like Steam, then releasing them ahead of the original. What split opinion in the thread was the ambiguous line between hand-made imitation games (which tend to get a pass) and AI-made imitations (which draw all the criticism), plus the structural problem that platform takedown responses can’t keep pace, letting whichever side releases first get recognized as “the original.” There was also talk that next year’s Steam Next Fest will reportedly feature more than twice as many demos as the previous year, raising concerns about how much of that could be low-effort AI-generated junk. Note that Alliance Arts’ announcement itself was framed around concerns over imitation works leaking out before release, and the original article does not explicitly state whether the company had actually suffered any such damage.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Hardware/Industry (Geha)) thread “[Sad News] “AI Will Just Copy It” — Game Developer Cancels Public Demo Release.”
Leave a Reply