From our other sites
The story
Saga Prefecture’s Yoshinogari Town is hosting a special exhibition, “Yamataikoku Reborn: The Lands of Toyo and Tango,” comparing the Yoshinogari ruins with archaeological sites in Buzen/Bungo and Tango, running through November 8. The exhibit focuses on the Yayoi through early Kofun periods — the era surrounding the Yamataikoku described in the Chinese chronicle “Records of Wei: Account of the Wa” — displaying jar coffins, bronze spearheads, and other artifacts from various regions that reveal both traces of exchange and distinct local cultures. In response, 5ch threads reignited the perennial debate over Yamataikoku’s location. Alongside the Kinai theory (based on the Makimuku ruins and Hashihaka Tomb) and the Kyushu theory (which emphasizes the Wei chronicle’s account), discussion expanded to cover genome analysis results and the origin of the name “Yamato,” with no resolution in sight.
A special exhibition, “Yamataikoku Reborn: The Lands of Toyo and Tango,” comparing the nationally designated special historic site Yoshinogari Ruins (Kanzaki City and Yoshinogari Town, Saga Prefecture) with archaeological sites from the Buzen/Bungo region and the Tango region of northern Kyoto Prefecture, is being held through November 8 at the Yoshinogari Hills Historical Park east entrance and the History Park Center’s “Multipurpose Room,” among other venues. (By Mei Tateyama)
This is the 18th installment of the “Yamataikoku Reborn” special exhibition series. This time, the focus is on the period from the Yayoi era through the early Kofun period — the era in which the “Records of Wei: Account of the Wa” places Yamataikoku.
The “Land of Toyo” display shows that, while there is evidence of exchange with northern Kyushu, a culture distinct from that of the Yoshinogari ruins developed there, as seen in differences such as jar coffins (kamekan) and settlement layouts. A pair of “medium-wide bronze spearheads,” about 80cm and 70cm long, are analyzed as having been used in rituals.
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
It was probably horse-riding peoples from the Korean peninsula who directly connected to the Yamato dynasty.
There were no keyhole-shaped tombs yet when Himiko was jointly enthroned as queen, so the keyhole tombs belong to the Yamato dynasty, which is separate from Yamataikoku.
BBJ Contemporary Japanese Genome Sequencing, published in Nature on November 12, 2024 (171,287 people)
Assuming Princess Momoso really is the one buried in Hashihaka Tomb, unless someone can clearly explain why she'd be buried in a tomb fit for a great king, it seems hard to overturn the Yamato (Kinai) theory.
>Assuming Princess Momoso really is the one buried in Hashihaka Tomb
Japan never had the custom of inscribed grave markers, so it's unprovable. And it's not even the era where you'd find an inscribed iron sword like the one from Inariyama.
Huh? You're asking me to disprove something that was never proven in the first place?
I mean, they sent envoys basically saying 'we're about to lose to our neighbor, please help,' so…
It's only recorded because the Wei chronicle happened to mention it. The pre-Yamataikoku ancient civilization of Kyushu deserves a grander name of its own.
Honestly, naming it 'Yayoi' after Yayoi-cho in Bunkyo Ward just doesn't fit anymore.
In other words, trying to match Amaterasu or Jinmu to actual historical relics is pointless.
Amaterasu's grandson is Ninigi, not Jinmu, you know.
It's not about strictly mapping the genealogy — the point is just to hint that this kind of relationship exists. The defeat of Nigihayahi's clan, a divine lineage, represents the defeat of Prince Otomo, a relative but not a direct descendant of Empress Jito. It's all a story built for the grandson Jito doted on.
If we're talking about grandsons, I kind of feel like it'd be enough to just say Emperor Shomu — grandson of both Genmei and Fujiwara no Fuhito — is Ninigi, Amaterasu's grandson, and that the story ties into the descent from heaven to legitimize his succession…
Nigihayahi = Omononushi no Mikoto, so that's a 3rd-century story. It's way too far removed in time from Empress Jito.
Well what about the Kojiki/Nihon Shoki, which claims Emperor Jinmu was 3 meters tall with horns on his head, a dorsal fin, and a tail?
https://dec.2chan.net/up2/src/fu7325350.jpeg
Did a country like that even really exist?
Apparently the kingdom that actually had contact with Japan at the time was Wu, and Wei was trying to build a new connection. So it's a pretty shaky record — it only survives because the Wei-Jin dynasty was later recognized as legitimate. We'd need to check Wu's records to really know.
The Nihon Shoki records that, in the 4th century (?), there was a country ruled by a queen in Yamato-gun, so it wouldn't be strange for a shamaness-ruled country to have existed in northern Kyushu.
That said, the exact location and name of that country are unknown from any source other than the Wei chronicle — and even the Wei chronicle itself doesn't pin down the location.
https://dec.2chan.net/up2/src/fu7325390.jpeg
Huh? What's your evidence for that?
Also, Makimuku is Omononushi's palace, period. Ignoring the fact that Omononushi is actually enshrined there and calling it 'Himiko's palace' instead is just a conclusion-first stretch.
When exactly was she there? She's a figure whose very existence is shaky.
'Himiko' is a title, not a personal name, isn't it?
Apparently it's called 'rekidai sengu' (relocating the palace with each new reign) — moving the palace every time there was a succession was a regular custom.
Well, I'm talking about how distinctive that is. The Jochi Ulus in Mongolia also had mobile palaces and lived while moving them around. Europe once had a tradition of mobile courts too. These all stem from the influence of nomadic, non-sedentary culture.
In Japan's case, though, there's the grim custom of 'mogari' (temporary interment) for the previous ruler's funeral — I think it comes from their view of death and the afterlife, not from any nomadic, non-sedentary culture.
That's a baseless stretch. In ancient Japan, what's now dismissed as the crude folk-belief of 'kegare' (ritual impurity) was actually the mainstream view. And honestly, if you chalk up every single event to some ideology or policy, you're basically denying any real analysis.
I also think the palace-relocation-per-reign custom had strong religious meaning. Yamato had a culture where shamanesses held a lot of power, so it probably had a purification/impurity-cleansing meaning — at least before Emperor Ojin. The Kawachi court was unusually martial for its era, so it might've been a bit different there.
Of course, there's some chance the name was borrowed from somewhere else, but looking at other examples in Japan, deliberately relabeling a place with a name from elsewhere seems pretty unlikely.
Apparently there actually aren't that many surviving 'Yamato' place names across the country, for something supposedly generic.
By the way, let me share a fairly old paper (?) that's been posted a few times in previous Yamataikoku threads.
'A Study of the Yamato Place Name'
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b6ae3a2-3e79-4b67-bf42-a865daefee53/content
Of course, I don't personally agree wholeheartedly with everything written in it, and there are plenty of parts I find unconvincing, but the overall gist should be worth a read as reference material.
It's a short piece, so if you've got some free time, give it a look.
Huh, thanks. So it turns out 'there are few examples of transplanting place names' was clearly a misconception.
This is interesting. The 'Yamato' place name comes paired with 'Miwa,' as in Miwa Shrine, where Okuninushi — said to be from the Izumo lineage — is enshrined. Fukuoka Prefecture's Yamato-gun likewise has an Ogami-go, once called 'Ohomiwa.' Nearby, in Shiratori-go, there's also Shiratori Shrine, which enshrines Yamato Takeru — suggesting the Kinai 'Yamato' place name was transplanted there.
Background and Key Points of This Topic
The debate over Yamataikoku’s location is a long-running controversy stemming from the fact that the directional and distance descriptions in the Chinese-side source “Records of Wei: Account of the Wa” contain contradictions and can’t pin down a location on their own. It broadly splits into the Kinai theory, which favors the Makimuku ruins in the Nara Basin, and the Kyushu theory, which places it in northern Kyushu. Some argue that Hashihaka Tomb, near the Makimuku ruins, is Himiko’s grave, but no grave marker or similar artifact directly identifying the occupant has been found — the claim rests solely on inferences from its age and scale. The genome analysis mentioned in the thread (the BBJ Japanese genome study published in November 2024) shows that the Kinai region has a stronger concentration of continental-immigrant genetic traits, while Kyushu, Okinawa, and Hokkaido show stronger Jomon-derived traits — but this is easily misread, since it isn’t direct evidence of Yamataikoku’s location. The Yoshinogari exhibition itself likewise isn’t meant to settle the location debate; it simply displays artifacts showing regional exchange and cultural differences within Kyushu.
※This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Speed+) thread “[Saga] Reflecting on Yamataikoku: Comparing the archaeological sites of “Yoshinogari,” “Buzen/Bungo,” and “Tango” — artifacts showing traces of exchange and different cultures” on 5ch.
Leave a Reply