“We Gave in to Temptation”: Sex Inside Facility Gets Nara Police Officers Disciplined

From our other sites

The story

On September 30, Nara Prefectural Police announced that it had disciplined a female officer in her 20s and a 19-year-old male officer for having sex inside a police facility while off duty. The two reportedly explained that they “gave in to their urges.” On 5channel threads, some argued the punishment was only natural since the facility was a public building built with taxpayer money, while others questioned how harsh it was, asking “Is this really serious enough to warrant resignation?” Many also raised the simple question of why they didn’t just use a love hotel or some other location instead.

“We Gave in to Our Urges”: Nara Police Discipline Male and Female Officers Over Sex at Police Facility

Wed, Sep 30, 18:39 JST

Mainichi Shimbun

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

22AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:20
Just let it go.
If it's not affecting their work, leave them alone.
181AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:42
Re: #22
It IS a problem, that's the whole point…
28AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:22
Sync your days off and go to a love hotel.
They got caught because they were too cheap to pay for a hotel and did it in the police box break room instead.
39AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:24
Wait, you're not allowed to do it off duty?
53AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:26
Re: #39
On duty or off duty doesn't matter — a police facility is a public building built with citizens' tax money.
It's not a love hotel.
46AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:25
They must've busted their ass at the police academy, and now this — too dumb for words.
118AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:32
Can someone explain in simple terms what exactly they did wrong here?
131AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:34
Re: #118
The problem is public servants used a public facility — built with Japanese taxpayers' money — as a substitute for a love hotel.
Even an ordinary citizen having sex in a public library bathroom would get the police called on them.
136AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:34
Re: #118
Off-duty use of the facility for something other than its intended purpose

That technically counts as trespassing.
119AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:32
I mean, if they'd each been off doing their own solo business that'd be one thing, but they're in their teens and twenties — of course they're gonna have sex. They probably got swept up in the moment and forgot where they were.
Wouldn't a "don't do it again" warning be enough?
159AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:38
Re: #119
That's literally already how it was handled.
121AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:33
Couldn't a reprimand from their superior have been enough? Did they really have to resign?
139AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:34
Re: #121
It's a "voluntary" resignation — that's just the police's own peculiar custom.
124AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:33
Cut them some slack for having sex on the job.
The birth rate's low enough as it is.
270AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:55
Re: #124
Public servants are expected to set an example in their conduct even off the clock.
Police officers used to have restrictions on things like owning a personal car, taking on debt, or even who they could date as a potential spouse.
And a public servant on duty becomes a public figure — something a moron like you probably doesn't even know.
140AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:34
It's really not that big a deal.
They shouldn't have had to resign over it.
141AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:35
Re: #140
They should've just gone to a love hotel.
226AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:48
Re: #140
They probably couldn't bear to stick around after this — they'd be known forever as "the one who did it at the police station."
143AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:35
Re: #131
If it was off duty, they should've just done it at his place (or her place) to begin with.
Both of them just aren't very bright.
154AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:37
Re: #143
Exactly.
They skimped on the love hotel fee and went at it hard in the station's nap room, so some virgin coworker ratted them out.
153AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:37
Why deliberately do it there when you're off duty, though?
161AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:38
Re: #153
Gotta be the thrill of it, right?
204AnonymousSep 30, 2026 22:46
Re: #1
Female officer (29)
Male officer (19)
290AnonymousSep 30, 2026 23:00
Release their names and faces.
That's the best deterrent against this happening again.
293AnonymousSep 30, 2026 23:01
Re: #290
Those guys go easy on their own, as usual.
305AnonymousSep 30, 2026 23:04
So if you do it at your workplace after hours, you get fired?
306AnonymousSep 30, 2026 23:06
Re: #305
Public facility
Private facility
That's the huge difference right there.

Background and Key Points of This Discussion

Public servants — police officers especially — are expected to uphold social norms even outside working hours, and using a facility for purposes other than intended can be treated as conduct that undermines public trust under Japan’s Local Public Service Act, making it grounds for disciplinary action. What stands out in this case is that the officers were pushed toward what’s called “voluntary resignation.” This is a practice unique to Japan’s police organizations in which, rather than a formal dismissal, the departure is framed as the employee’s own choice — though in practice the person is often left with little real option but to quit. Also worth noting: although the male officer is 19, Japan’s 2022 revision to the Civil Code lowered the age of adulthood to 18, so he is legally an adult, meaning this case does not involve a minor. The thread shows a clash between a norm-based view (“it’s unacceptable because it’s a public facility”) and a more lenient view (“it’s a private matter, not that big a deal”), highlighting the underlying difficulty of drawing the line on how much personal freedom public servants should be allowed in their private lives.

※This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5channel (Newsplus) thread “[Nara Prefectural Police] “We Gave in to Our Urges”: Officers in Their 20s (F) and Teens (M) Disciplined for Sex at Police Facility.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *