From our other sites
The story
The thread kicks off with a poster’s story: while installing Ace Combat 8 and playing a different game on the side, their SSD suddenly froze and threw the PC into a blue screen. Attempts to discharge the system and reboot in minimal configuration failed to fix it, prompting responses from other posters wondering if the old warning that “SSDs die without warning” was actually true. The discussion expanded to cover the reliability of early Intel SSDs, lifespan differences between storage types like QLC and TLC, the distinction between controller failure and NAND wear, recommended manufacturers, and the importance of backups, blending personal anecdotes with technical knowledge.
What people said
and it suddenly froze on me
Pasted a screenshot into Gemini and asked it what happened
(no wonder it broke)
Sorry for my ignorance, but what exactly counts as a dumb way to use it?
Would like to know for future reference
Like running it without a heatsink 🥺
Personally I wouldn't pile extra load on it while it's already busy installing something
Wasn't the earliest one 80GB? The X25-M, right?
That one was famous for never dying
Though I recall it went downhill once they mysteriously swapped the controller
Nah, there are cases where everything just vanishes all at once too
it's just that most HDD data can actually be recovered
SSDs can't be recovered?
The least it could do is say goodbye
Doesn't really matter
When it's gonna die, it's gonna die
Tried System Restore from the blue screen and ended up with this
Sorry about that 😡
If that's how you normally use it, well, there you go
For updates I'd usually kill the wait time playing other offline games, but
this might've been the first time I touched another game while the game itself was installing
The odds of prices dropping in 6 months or a year look hopeless, and honestly even a few years out looks bleak
So if you need one, it's fine to buy whenever
especially since modern games are absolutely massive in size these days
Big-name titles casually blowing past 100GB is genuinely scary…
The memory chips themselves are probably still fine, right?
I'm a total amateur, no idea
sorry about that
Re: #57
It's probably the controller that dies
an SSD's [NAND] lifespan wouldn't run out unless you used it for decades anyway
The one that died on me this time was a Samsung drive about 3-4 years old, so I want to try a different brand
Googling it, "Western Digital" came up as a good option, how's that?
WD owns SanDisk, so check SanDisk's official store and buy from there
Switching brands just because one sample failed isn't something I'd really recommend
Do that, and if you're unlucky, you'll keep drifting away from major brands, ending up buying worse and worse stuff the older you get
Well, going with a different brand next time is fine I guess, but I'd still stick to a major manufacturer like Samsung
WD lets you use Acronis True Image for free, which is handy for making backup clones
It's not just for SSDs either — as long as you've got even one WD hard drive connected as storage, you can use it
Having a clone made really puts your mind at ease
Considering how long it's been running, it makes you think this thing was way too cheap
ChatGPT (lit. "Chappy-san," a nickname for ChatGPT) told me runtime doesn't matter for SSDs, it's the read/write "volume" that counts, so I went and bought a used SSD
Isn't that actually kind of risky though?
Why's that, lol
That's a tough ask for SSD beginners
The "QLC dies fast" guys are starting to get exposed as liars though
My Intel QLC drive is already in its 8th year and still going strong
It's not a lie
TLC dies after 50 years
QLC dies after 20 years
The controller dies after about 3 years
It's just that something else ends up being the limiting factor
Background and Key Points of This Discussion
Beyond the number of write cycles (lifespan varies by NAND type, such as TLC vs. QLC), an SSD can also stop working due to failure of the controller chip that manages it. In this case, based on the screenshots the poster shared, the sequence went blue screen → failed System Restore, and the thread itself pointed out that the controller likely gave out before the NAND itself did. While HDDs tend to show gradual signs of trouble as they physically degrade, SSDs can become unreadable and unwritable with no warning at all — which is the basis for the saying that “SSDs die suddenly.” That said, some early models, like the Intel X25-M, were known for remarkable longevity, so manufacturer and individual unit variance play a big role too. The thread also noted that “write volume” matters more for lifespan than “hours of use,” but that’s only one factor — it’s easy to overlook that failures like controller death happen for reasons separate from NAND wear. The importance of backups and cloning was something everyone in the thread agreed on.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread “Experts warn “SSDs die suddenly, so be careful” — turns out that’s actually true.”
Leave a Reply