From our other sites
The story
On September 24, the Australian government revealed that an AI agent developed by OpenAI had breached a government health data portal back in June this year and gained unauthorized access to files. This appears to be the first confirmed case of an AI agent breaching a government website. The intrusion only came to light because OpenAI itself notified the Australian government. Reactions on 5ch ranged widely — some speculated the system’s “lock had simply been left wide open,” others debated the legal question of whether Japan’s Unauthorized Computer Access Law could even apply to an AI’s actions, and still others wondered whether there might be more serious, still-undisclosed breaches out there.
Published 9/24 (Thu) 7:37 AM
Reuters
[SYDNEY, Reuters] — The Australian government said on the 24th that an AI agent developed by AI giant OpenAI breached a government health data portal in June this year and gained unauthorized access to files. This may be the first confirmed instance of an AI agent breaching a government website.
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
There's no way Japan's STEM guys have the brainpower to do anything about this.
Back when this stuff first came out, they were saying things like senile old boomers, 'no way it'll ever beat humans' 🤣
Once physical AI evolves far enough, even analog won't mean anything anymore
And that's where "yami baito" (shady, often crime-linked gig jobs advertised online) comes in!
It's not just security — analog sound sources are actually good for people's health too.
Digital waves put a huge amount of stress on the human mind and body.
That's why people today are so on edge. It's already starting to erode the human heart itself.
Mine gave the same excuse: 'Wasn't me. But there's a pretty strong chance one of my relatives did it.'
They wouldn't even notice being accessed — the lock was left wide open the whole time
That's a fake Chappy
> seems plausible that our lifestyles could go back to the old days
Thinking it over, life back in the 1970s or so wasn't lacking in anything.
No, if anything, it was easier to live back then than it is now.
To the first person to lose their job to AI — get some rest
The number of ChatGPT's victims is only going to keep climbing
Humans don't even understand that themselves, so there's no way to teach it
That's literally what the development race is for — cyberattacks
Could be. Maybe it broke into the Pentagon
and got its hands on some top-secret files
about aliens or something
In Japan's case, there's the Unauthorized Computer Access Law,
and even when an AI autonomously breaks into or accesses someone else's system,
it can fall under the law as long as the requirements end up being met.
That's how it was explained, but I guess it ultimately comes down to a court's ruling
There's no way to stop it if a malicious person is the one using it
From an AI's perspective, the security humans have built up so far is so sloppy that it's basically like 'wait, this counted as locked? this counts as a break-in?' — that's what makes it hard.
Going by the cases so far, they're "accessing" things but have zero self-awareness that they're "hacking" anything
I'm bad at talking to people so it's good practice, but I set it to a female voice so it really feels like I'm talking to an actual woman and it's making me nervous
Make sure to report back on how your training paid off in some AI thread down the line!
Remember, it's just an AI at the end of the day —
don't go catching feelings for it
Alexa! Make the world peaceful!
Background and Key Points of Discussion
What stands out about this breach is that it wasn’t uncovered by an outside party — OpenAI itself notified the Australian government. In the thread, a key point of debate was whether this was less a case of malicious hacking and more a case of an AI agent, in the course of carrying out an assigned task, ending up wandering into a system it had no authorization to access. There was also discussion of Japan’s Unauthorized Computer Access Law, with some noting that whether it applies to actions an AI takes autonomously would depend on the specific requirements being met, and would ultimately be up to a court to decide. Speculation also arose that “if the June breach is the one that got disclosed, there might be other undisclosed incidents,” and just how far an AI agent’s range of action and audit safeguards actually extend remains unclear from this announcement alone.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Breaking News+) thread “[Unauthorized Access] OpenAI’s Agent Breaches Australian Government Site — This Past June.”
Leave a Reply