New Allegations Surface Over Tomomi Itano’s ‘Changing-Room Vlog’ — 5ch: ‘At This Point, Isn’t This Just a Fetish?’

From our other sites

The story

Tomomi Itano (35), a former member of AKB48, is facing backlash over a family vacation vlog she posted on YouTube on September 3. The video appears to include footage shot in what looks like the changing room of the luxury hotel ‘The Ritz-Carlton, Nikko,’ and the hotel’s explanation has since shifted more than once. Reports have also surfaced alleging that similar filming took place last year as well. On 5ch, commenters questioned whether the hotel actually has the authority or contractual grounds to grant ‘special permission’ to film in a changing room, while others questioned the very mindset of filming and posting even a family trip — with much of the discussion waiting to hear Itano’s side of the story.

9/8 (Tue) 18:40

So this wasn’t the first time after all. Former AKB48 member Tomomi Itano (35) is in the middle of a firestorm over ‘changing-room footage’ at a luxury hotel — and the controversy has now brought a new allegation to light.

It all started with a video posted to Itano’s YouTube channel on September 3, titled ‘[Summer Vacation] A Family Trip to Nikko for the First Time in a While, Just the Three of Us [Vlog].’

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Read the original article here

What people said

2AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:44
Just how badly does she want to film everything?
11AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:49
Re: #2
Of course she's desperate — it's all in service of her 'look how amazing I am' flex.
55AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:37
Re: #2
Filming and posting even her family trip, down to every last detail — that's honestly kind of sad.
3AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:44
Guess she just really likes filming in changing rooms.
4AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:46
Yeah, I'm never staying at a Ritz-Carlton again.
10AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:47
At this point, isn't this basically a fetish?
16AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:53
If there really was special permission, Itano should just show the proof.
17AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:53
'Itatomo' (her nickname) had better apologize soon.
19AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:54
Even common sense has to be taught by someone the first time —
if you've been in the entertainment world since you were a little kid,
there's a real chance you never picked up even elementary-school-level common sense.

I bet she already knows she screwed up, honestly.
She just can't bring herself to apologize because her pride's in the way.
20AnonymousSep 8, 2026 18:57
Maybe she's decided that going viral and getting her name out there is actually a win —
kind of like Horiemon or the 'Green Juice Prince' (scandal-prone entrepreneurs known for courting attention).
21AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:00
Can a hotel really just unilaterally grant 'special permission' to film in a changing room?
If it were a private rental or filming after regular hours, sure, maybe —
but does the Ritz-Carlton actually have the right to sign away guests' privacy over their own nudity?
Does their terms of service really say something like 'privacy rights during your stay belong to the hotel'?
Whether a contract like that could even be valid is exactly the problem here.
29AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:12
Why bother filming in the changing room of all places?
Didn't want people finding out she booked a lower-grade room or something?
33AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:19
Re: #29
If she'd stayed in a suite, the room would've come with its own fancy washroom anyway.
36AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:21
Call it common sense, or maybe just basic consideration for others.
37AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:21
Can't they arrest her for violating some local ordinance or something?
38AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:22
New facts emerge from hotel's follow-up response in Tomomi Itano 'vlog controversy' — even 'after-hours filming' wouldn't cover the changing room, as hotel tightens its no-filming policy
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/baac59eb2c0a558e813709c71ea91a42265cdd03
42AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:26
Re: #38
Wait, filming during the communal bath's off-hours? So filming actually was permitted, then?
44AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:30
Re: #38
Saying filming wasn't permitted specifically because it was after hours doesn't even make sense, does it?
Whatever — both explanations sound like flimsy excuses cobbled together after the fact.
45AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:33
'After hours' — wait, does that mean she just snuck in without permission?
49AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:35
Re: #45
If that's the case, then the real problem is the hotel's security letting someone into the bath after hours in the first place.
62AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:51
She probably thinks being special means she's allowed to do anything.
64AnonymousSep 8, 2026 19:57
Huh?! I'm a former idol, you know? The hotel should be thrilled, right??
69AnonymousSep 8, 2026 20:01
Why take selfies in the restroom's powder room in the first place?
76AnonymousSep 8, 2026 20:09
Re: #69
Because a mirror alone doesn't cut it — what matters is how it looks on camera/screen.
Your own reflection looks different too, you know? A photo of yourself in a mirror is the flipped version of how others actually see you — mirrors reverse things like your dominant eye and bone structure, so of course the impression is different.
81AnonymousSep 8, 2026 20:16
Anyone who brags about staying at the Ritz-Carlton Nikko is going to get 'oh, the Itano hotel' from now on.
Isn't that a bigger blow for the Ritz's reputation than for her?
84AnonymousSep 8, 2026 20:17
Re: #81
You're overestimating how famous Itano actually is —
most people don't even know who she is.

Background and Key Points of the Discussion

At the heart of this controversy is the fact that the hotel’s explanation has shifted more than once. It was initially said that ‘special permission’ had been granted, but a later, additional explanation claimed the filming happened ‘after business hours.’ On 5ch, many pointed out the apparent contradiction between that explanation and the statement that ‘even after hours, changing-room filming is barred as part of a tightened policy.’ Some posts in the thread called for clarity on the legal basis for how far a hotel can even go in authorizing filming that touches on other guests’ privacy in shared facilities, but no clear answer has emerged. Additionally, the claim that ‘similar allegations arose last year as well’ comes from part of the original reporting — the thread itself doesn’t get into the details of what happened back then or how it was handled, so whether this is a genuine pattern will have to wait for further reporting.

*This article is compiled and summarized from the 5ch (Geinou/Sports News+) thread ‘“Is This a Habit?” Tomomi Itano Draws Harsh Criticism After Last Year’s Changing-Room Filming at the Ritz Nikko Also Comes to Light.’

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *