France’s Unauthorized Dragon Ball Park Sparks Debate — 5ch: ‘It’s a Problem Because They Didn’t Even Change Anything’

From our other sites

The story

A thread on 5ch’s Livegalileo (“Anything Goes Live”) board claimed that a facility in France may have been built without permission, using Dragon Ball as its motif. The thread’s original poster argued, “Don’t use elements derived from China, like the Ruyi Jingu Bang (magic staff) and Flying Nimbus cloud, without permission as if they’re Japanese culture.” Other posters pushed back one after another, saying things like “Of course Son Goku’s roots trace back to China’s Journey to the West” and “The real issue is copyright, not some claim that the origin is being falsified.” The discussion went in circles over copyright and design similarity, and no resolution was ever reached.

What people said

1AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:05
Don't just help yourself to Japanese culture (←China's Son Goku, Ruyi Jingu Bang, Flying Nimbus, and other Chinese elements)!
↑Man, this guy's a monster…
3AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:07
Whose rights does that even violate?
5AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:08
Re: #3
It's not about infringement — it's about falsifying the origin.
6AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:09
Well yeah, Dragon Ball itself was made in Japan, so of course it is.
21AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:32
Re: #19
I think you'd find it if you dug through the old logs, but for now it's really just Re: #6 saying it's "original."
22AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:37
Re: #21
Huh? Isn't Re: #6 just saying Dragon Ball is Japanese, not that Son Goku himself originated in Japan?
10AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:11
Re: #5
Who's even doing that???
11AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:12
Re: #9
Do you have a screenshot or something of anyone actually saying that?
17AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:24
Re: #10
Re: #11

Like this, for example

Re: #2
Doesn't Luffy have charm? He's innocent, a big eater — basically a straight-up Goku ripoff, but still.

https://itest.5ch.io/medaka/test/read.cgi/csaloon/1633982168/3-n
19AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:25
Re: #17
Oh sorry, not that one — I meant the "Son Goku originated in Japan!" claim. That's the origin-falsifying part, right?
23AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:38
Re: #19
Re: #20
Also, he's used as an Olympics ambassador character, so it's a government claim too. He was used as a Japanese character at the Osaka Expo as well.
25AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:40
Re: #23
Well, obviously — Dragon Ball's Son Goku was made in Japan based on the Son Goku from Journey to the West. What are you even trying to say?
27AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:44
Re: #23
Being an ambassador has nothing to do with origin, though.
31AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:45
Re: #28
Not copyright — I said "ripoff."
37AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:50
Re: #32
Sounds like you want to frame this as copyright, but what if France just says a slightly tweaked design doesn't infringe? Like that Shiying Mountain amusement park. Also, Goku, the Ruyi Jingu Bang, and the Flying Nimbus are all Chinese public-domain material anyway, so they're free to use.
39AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:52
Re: #37
Then France should just build a theme park with their own original Son Goku and Flying Nimbus, no?
40AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:53
So in the end there's no source for this origin-claim thing. Impressive that someone can rant this hard on pure delusion.
43AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:55
Re: #40
The Olympics ambassador thing. The Goku merch rollout at the Expo.
46AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:56
Re: #43
How does that connect to an origin claim at all?
47AnonymousSep 8, 2026 09:57
Re: #44
Oh, so it's about copyright. So you're saying just tweak Dragon Ball a little and it's fine?
51AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:00
Re: #47
It's a problem precisely because they didn't change anything.
57AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:05
Re: #46
So you're saying it's fine as long as you don't say it outright?
59AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:06
Re: #57
There's no copyright on the name "Goku."
61AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:07
Re: #57
I haven't said anything, outright or vaguely.
87AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:26
In the end there's still no source for the origin claim. What was this guy even trying to accomplish?
93AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:28
Re: #87
Re: #87
It's just mockery. It means "acting like" the origin. That's why he's mad at France.
95AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:29
Re: #93
He's mad about copyright infringement. Don't you even know what copyright is?
96AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:30
Re: #93
Oh, so you've given up citing Re: #43 as your source? lol
98AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:31
Re: #88
Re: #89
I'm not a hater either. I am bashing it, though — would you believe me if I said that?
105AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:34
Re: #98
Whatever, do as you like. I don't care whether you're a hater or not.
107AnonymousSep 8, 2026 10:34
Re: #98
Whether you're a hater or not doesn't matter to me either.

Background and Key Points of This Debate

The character Son Goku was created by Akira Toriyama for Dragon Ball, based on the Great Sage Equal to Heaven, Sun Wukong, who appears in the 16th-century Chinese classic Journey to the West. Motifs like the Ruyi Jingu Bang and the Flying Nimbus also trace back to Journey to the West, but the specific design and story of Dragon Ball’s Son Goku are an original creation copyrighted by Akira Toriyama, Bird Studio, and Toei Animation. Throughout the thread, a cultural argument (“they’re falsifying the origin”) and a legal argument (“if the design is being used without permission, it’s a copyright issue”) talked past each other, running in parallel without ever meeting. Notably, no primary source or news report confirming that the French facility was actually built without authorization was ever presented in the thread — much of the speculation grew out of indirect facts, like Son Goku being used as an official Olympics ambassador and merchandise tie-ins at the Osaka-Kansai Expo.

※This article is compiled and summarized from the 5ch (Anything Goes Live) thread “Dora-oji: “Did France Build a Dragon Ball Park Without Permission?”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *