A Third Type of Magnetism Discovered for the First Time in 90 Years: The Truth Behind “Altermagnets”

From our other sites

The story

For many years, magnetic properties have been classified into two types: “ferromagnetism,” in which all spins align in the same direction, and “antiferromagnetism,” in which neighboring spins point in opposite directions and cancel out so no external magnetism appears. The former has been known since ancient times, while the latter was discovered in 1933. Recently, however, researchers found materials whose spins alternate like an antiferromagnet’s, yet which can still carry a flow of spin (a “spin current”) the way ferromagnets do — and in 2022 this class was named “altermagnets.” On the 5ch Science News+ board, a thread saw a string of replies explaining the mechanics of this new classification, along with discussion of its relationship to magnetic monopoles and chirality.

After decades of being split into just two types, a third kind of magnetism has now been confirmed

The magnets that hold your kid’s drawings to the fridge or point a compass needle north are a familiar, tangible force for most people.

But to physicists, magnetism is one of the quantum properties of matter, and it’s far more intricate than that.

Source: nazology.kusuguru.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

3AnonymousNov 7, 2026 03:05
Plus➕ Minus➖
And then divide➗, huh※
4AnonymousNov 7, 2026 04:57
Not all materials with magnetic properties show externally detectable magnetism.

Guess it says we still need better observation tech!
So does that mean even brain-machine interfaces (EEG) turn out to be incomplete for this too?
5AnonymousNov 7, 2026 04:59
I'm reading Re: #4 as implying we might also be able to observe the insides of black holes

And I'm reading Re: #4 as implying dark matter could be observed this way too
6AnonymousNov 7, 2026 05:01
Isn't dark matter detection shaping up to come down to shockwaves ("sound waves"), gravity, or magnetism?

If we could observe the magnetic fields produced by the method above, couldn't that lead to actually finding dark matter?
7AnonymousNov 7, 2026 05:58
You guys don't even know what a "monopole" is?
9AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:39
Is this what you mean by Re: #7?

Still undiscovered as a fundamental particle: as of 2026, magnetic monopoles have yet to be confirmed as an independent elementary particle, either in nature or in accelerator experiments.
38AnonymousNov 7, 2026 11:55
Re: Re: #7
Someone smart, enlighten me (lit. "erotic person" — 5ch slang for a know-it-all)
10AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:41
First, let's check how physicists actually look at magnets.
What matters is a property every single electron has — one often compared to spinning on its own axis, called "spin."
Spin comes in "up" and "down," and when these line up in a set pattern, the material is considered magnetic.
The first type, ferromagnetism, is when all spins align in the same direction.
Because the directions line up and a magnetic field shows up externally, humans have known about and used this kind of magnet since ancient times.
The second type, antiferromagnetism, was discovered in 1933, where spins alternate up-down-up-down.
Since neighboring spins cancel each other out, the material as a whole produces no external magnetic force.
For nearly 90 years after that, it was taken for granted that magnetism split into just these two kinds.
11AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:42
Here's what the paper behind Re: #1 is actually about

In recent years, materials have turned up that seem to have both characteristics at once.
Their spins alternate like an antiferromagnet's, with no net magnetization overall.
And yet, they apparently can carry a spin current the way a ferromagnet does.
These two properties were once thought to be mutually exclusive.
So in 2022, researchers gave this strange group of materials the name "altermagnet."
14AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:48
The conclusion for Re: #13 is laid out on page 3 of Re: #1, so check the main article text
15AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:49
It's been proven that even using the phenomenon in Re: #13, time still can't be made to flow backward
16AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:51
From the past to the future
From the future to the past

The theory that this kind of movement called "time travel" is impossible just got more precise!
17AnonymousNov 7, 2026 07:52
A third property: zero magnetic force, yet it still has spin

Has humanity pushed spin tech forward another step…
34AnonymousNov 7, 2026 09:44
N pole and S pole makes two
I figured the third one would be something that doesn't stick together and isn't a "pole" at all — but that's not it

Ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic makes two
Looks like antiferromagnetic just splits into two, making three
Feels like ferromagnetic might split into two as well over some spin business
35AnonymousNov 7, 2026 10:17
In 2022, researchers proposed the term "altermagnets" to label this wily class of materials.

That's what they're saying, apparently
"Oltermagnetzu" or whatever (mangled pronunciation)
36AnonymousNov 7, 2026 10:20
So what is it, then
The last piece of the puzzle is chirality
Oh right, that's the thing someone was joking sounds like "kira-kira" (sparkly)
37AnonymousNov 7, 2026 11:14
No wonder I felt so lost
39AnonymousNov 7, 2026 12:17
W pole and E pole
Just kidding
40AnonymousNov 7, 2026 13:02
I was genuinely shocked — thought the image in that link was my own hairline
41AnonymousNov 7, 2026 13:09
Re: Re: #1
That's gotta be a gross-out image, viewer discretion advised

It's like one of those "hasu-kora" shots (lotus-seed-pod collages — a classic trypophobia meme)

Re: Re: #40
Sorry about that…

Background and key points of this discussion

The “third property” mentioned here isn’t a new magnetic pole to sit alongside N and S — it’s an additional category in how electron spins can be arranged. Against the 90-year-old split between ferromagnetism (all spins aligned) and antiferromagnetism (alternating spins that cancel out), altermagnets arrange their spins in an antiferromagnetic-like pattern while still generating a spin current, which is why they’re drawing interest for low-power spintronics applications. The thread saw some confusion mistaking this for a discussion of monopoles, plus tangents into still-unconfirmed magnetic monopole research, but the original article’s real focus is that the symmetry of the crystal structure (chirality) is the key to this property. Since the back half of the thread also drifted into unrelated posts about brain-stimulation research and conspiracy-flavored comments, this article focuses on the exchanges specifically about magnetic classification.

※This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Science News+) thread “[Nazology] After decades of being split into just two types, a third kind of magnetism has now been confirmed.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *