Called police on a “prefectural employee” photographing his house, got a stern warning for obstructing official duties — 5ch asks: “Was there an official seal?”

From our other sites

The story

Early one morning, OP noticed someone photographing their house and called out to them. The person identified himself as “a prefectural employee” and showed a name tag. Without asking for further details, OP called the police — and was told by the officer, “This could’ve counted as obstruction of official duties,” before being let off with just a stern warning. It seems the visit was part of an investigation into a house built somewhere houses aren’t supposed to be built, but OP never found out exactly how it could have amounted to obstruction. The post sparked discussion on 5ch mainly around two questions: whether simply calling the police can legally count as obstruction of official duties, and whether the presence of an official seal on a name tag is really a reliable way to verify someone’s identity.

What people said

1AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:38
Just happened to me.
There was a sketchy-looking dorky guy (lit. "cheese-gyudon guy," 5ch slang for a nerdy, plain-looking young man) taking photos of my house.
When I called out to him, he said "I'm a prefectural employee" and showed me his name tag.
3AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:39
Did you ask him why he was taking photos?
7AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:42
Re: #3
Apparently he came to investigate because there's a house built somewhere houses aren't supposed to be built — but what the heck does that even mean?
5AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:42
You should've asked why it had to be done this early in the morning.
8AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:43
Re: #5
I didn't ask that much.
17AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:47
???
What exactly made it count as obstruction of official duties?
19AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:49
Re: #17
No idea.
If I'd been satisfied with the explanation, I wouldn't have bothered making a thread to complain about it.
18AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:48
I'm a government worker myself, I've been on the receiving end of this kind of scolding before.
Sorry about that.
20AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:49
Re: #18
You guys are the ones in the wrong here.
Seriously, reflect on that.
26AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:52
Re: #20
You're the one who should be reflecting — you're the one stuck with all the prejudice.
35AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:56
Re: #20
Morning traffic surveys can only be done in the morning.
Sorry about that.
22AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:50
Re: #19
It's not that you don't know — the police told you that themselves, right?
It shouldn't count as obstruction unless OP actually did something to interfere.
27AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:52
Re: #22
They basically told me, "This could've counted as obstruction of official duties. We'll let you off with a stern warning this time, but be careful next time." But I never asked exactly what part would've counted as obstruction.
28AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:52
Calling the police over something like this seems a bit much, don't you think?
30AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:53
Re: #28
So you wouldn't call the police even if there was a burglar? Woooow! So cooool!
33AnonymousOct 7, 2026 07:55
Re: #27
Just calling the police and holding up a prefectural employee's work for a bit wouldn't count as obstruction of official duties.
He probably did something else once the police showed up.
38AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:00
Re: #33
Guys like this usually leave out the inconvenient part.
42AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:06
Why would calling the police even amount to obstruction of official duties?

• The target has to be a "public official"
• They have to be "in the course of performing their duties"
• There has to be an act of "assault or intimidation"

Did he actually commit assault or intimidation?
45AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:09
Re: #42
He showed his name tag and OP still called the police anyway, so it's only fair.
50AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:12
Re: #45
These days there are even scammers who flash fake police badges, so just being suspicious and calling the police shouldn't count as obstructing official duties.
I bet there's something else he's leaving out.
58AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:18
Re: #45
Just calling the police wouldn't be enough to cause that.

Even the police themselves, when they go door-to-door for some investigation, have exchanges like "I can't tell if you're the real deal, I'll just check to be safe" — "Sure, go right ahead, great that you're security-conscious," so it's basically like that.
54AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:17
Re: #52
If OP genuinely, sincerely believed the guy was suspicious, I wonder how that plays into the relationship between a citizen's arrest and obstruction of official duties.
Seems like it would lack the criminal intent needed for obstruction.
56AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:18
Re: #54
Well, you could still get arrested regardless.
That kind of interpretation is something you'd argue out in court anyway.

Re: #52
Sorry, that was a weird reply.
55AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:18
Re: #53
Real name tags have an official seal on them.
There's no way just anyone could make one.
Maybe pick up some common sense before worrying about studying.
61AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:20
Re: #55
Normal people don't know that and have no way to tell the difference 😅
66AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:22
Re: #55
My city's doesn't have one.
And it only has the surname on it — just the city name, not even the department.
That's been the case since last year as a measure against customer harassment.
68AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:23
Re: #55
So my city office was the odd one out for not stamping an official seal on the name tag?
For the record, I do carry a separate employee ID too.
62AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:21
Re: #55
You mean the ID card, not the name tag?
67AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:23
Re: #62
The name tag gets the official seal stamped on it too.
Losing it is a normal "write up a formal incident report" offense.
69AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:24
Re: #67
I'm a city employee too, and mine isn't stamped.
63AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:22
Re: #58
Even if an officer shows up and checks with the police, that's just a records lookup — it's not like the police would actually come out for that.
84AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:35
Re: #63
The police are "in-house," so it's just handled over the phone — whether they physically show up or not doesn't make much of a difference.
64AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:22
Re: #61
Normal people do know an official seal exists.
You're just not normal.
83AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:34
Re: #64
I've never once been in a situation where I had to check a public official's name tag. Did you do something wrong to end up in one?
70AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:24
Re: #68
If there's a separate employee ID, the seal would be stamped on that instead, right?
74AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:26
Re: #70
What about national government employees whose ID is their My Number card?
Every administrative-track national civil servant uses a My Number card.
75AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:27
Lots of self-proclaimed government workers in this thread.
Work starts at 8:30 and yet you've got plenty of time to spare, huh.
78AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:29
Re: #75
Depends on the department, but the easy-going ones really are easy-going.
No morning meeting for me today either.
93AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:41
An official seal on the name tag? Mine doesn't have one.
94AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:43
Re: #93
Get back to work, government worker.
95AnonymousOct 7, 2026 08:44
Re: #94
My hours are 9:00 to 17:45.

Background and key points of this discussion

The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties (Article 95 of the Penal Code) is established when “assault or intimidation” is used against a public official in the course of their duties — simply calling the police to request identity verification would not normally meet that bar. Several commenters in the thread pointed this out, suggesting that the officer’s warning to OP to “be careful next time” may imply OP did something further even after the employee showed his name tag. Meanwhile, whether an official ID carries an official seal varies by municipality and by the type of credential (name tag vs. employee ID), and the thread’s own anecdotes were split between “mine has one” and “mine doesn’t.” This isn’t a nationwide standard — some municipalities have simplified their name tags as a measure against customer harassment — so judging the reliability of an identity check based solely on whether an official seal is present would be premature.

*This article is compiled as an excerpt/summary from the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread “I got a stern warning for obstruction of official duties.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *