From our other sites
The story
On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone strike hit three facilities in AWS’s ME-CENTRAL-1 region across Bahrain and the UAE. Exactly six months later, on September 15, AWS announced via its Health Dashboard that some customer data had been permanently lost. On 5ch’s Business News+ board, users questioned why cross-region backups hadn’t been in place, speculated that laws in the UAE and Bahrain barring customer data from leaving the country might be to blame, and the discussion expanded into broader geopolitical concerns about private data centers becoming military targets.
Six months after the Iranian strike, AWS has confirmed that data in its Bahrain and UAE ME-CENTRAL-1 region cannot be recovered — a lesson in cross-region backups.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced that some customer data stored in its Bahrain and UAE (United Arab Emirates) data centers can no longer be recovered.
The company spelled this out in its Health Dashboard on September 15, 2026, closing the chapter on an incident that struck three facilities in the ME-CENTRAL-1 region exactly six months earlier, on March 1, via an Iranian drone attack.
Source: pasqualepillitteri.it / Original article here
What people said
A new kind of hostage-taking for a new era.
Just like attacks on nuclear power plants are treated as off-limits, we need to regulate against striking data centers and AI facilities too, or things will become irreversible.
Though honestly, if it were up to an AI, it'd probably just order the strike itself lol
Swallowing it at face value just makes you easy to manipulate.
We don't even know if the announcement matches reality.
Don't you think so?
And why would data loss happen at all when it's AWS?
Even for regular users, losing data is on the user's own management responsibility.
If you didn't set up backups in a separate region, of course it's gone — that's just common sense.
Anyone who takes this story at face value must be clueless about IT.
Guess that's just how things work there.
I see, so it sounds like it was mainly UAE customers who got hit, then.
The Japanese government should copy that.
A chance to wipe out debt owed to inconvenient countries lol
Maybe it's also because if too much got exposed, it'd cause problems under Islamic law.
A glimpse into the quality of their management.
This is going to bleed customers —
no matter how irreplaceable the infrastructure is.
You should already get this since it was retracted —
user data is the user's own responsibility to manage.
AWS wouldn't normally say data is unrecoverable.
What AWS calls "data" here is cloud-management stuff like IAM user registration data.
Whatever apps the user runs on top are the user's own responsibility.
Ah, because otherwise the money laundering would get exposed to the US and Switzerland lol
Destroying a data center is an extremely effective tactic.
Not even considering that it might have been placed there in preparation for war — that's peacetime complacency talking.
The one behind that UAE operation is MGX,
the very same firm that's coming to build the data center in Akita.
Just raise the fees and spread it across domestic sites instead — everyone in the UAE is loaded anyway.
Isn't the physical data center management Amazon's job though?
True, but war and certain disasters fall under exemption clauses.
AWS provides the environment needed for multi-region setups — whether customers actually use it is on them.
Not sure what happened afterward, but it was a pretty massive amount of data.
So if a meteor hits, that's just game over?
Qatar looks pretty risky too.
Wasn't the UAE famous for hosting the CIA's "Dark Matter" data center?
The one reportedly running it was said to be MGX's Chinese CEO.
MGX is the same firm investing in the Akita data center, by the way.
Maybe we should build a massive underground space in some mountains, like the Matsushiro Imperial HQ (a WWII-era underground bunker complex), to prepare for bombing.
Worst case, even the extinction of humanity…
Nah, it won't. It's just data.
Background and Key Points of This Discussion
Cloud services can be configured with redundancy spanning multiple regions, but under AWS’s “shared responsibility model,” designing and executing cross-region backups is the customer’s job — it isn’t automatically replicated by default. The overseas data-transfer restrictions in the UAE and Bahrain that commenters pointed to reflect financial and personal-data protection frameworks common across Gulf states, a structure that tends to concentrate data centers within a single country. This incident showed that private cloud infrastructure can become a target of military attack, drawing comparisons to arguments for protecting critical infrastructure like nuclear plants — yet no international regulatory framework covering attacks on data centers exists at this point. Opinions in the thread split over where responsibility lies: contractually, the fault falls on customer companies that failed to configure multi-region backups, but there was also persistent criticism of the underlying management decision to concentrate critical infrastructure in a conflict zone in the first place.
*This article is compiled as an excerpt and summary of the 5ch (Business News+) thread “AWS Region Struck by Iranian Attack: Amazon Announces Permanent Data Loss.”
Leave a Reply