From our other sites
The story
Reports spread through a thread that multiple videos on VTuber Shigure Ui’s YouTube channel had been age-restricted, cutting off monetization. Posters suspected an automated system tied to YouTube’s child-safety policies was to blame, but because the timing overlapped with backlash from a recent project/collaboration, speculation flew linking the two — the actual cause was never pinned down in the thread itself. The discussion branched well past a simple “sad news” post, mixing complaints about the unfairness of the demonetization, questions about whether YouTube applies the same standard to all controversy-prone VTubers, and skepticism about how the AI detection system works in the first place.
What people said
Ah, I see.
If that's really true, that's a huge blow.
The person who actually does it does get identified.
It just never reaches whoever's consulting for them or employing them behind the scenes.
Seriously, same.
A lot of people seem to think mezzo piano is just some [random] company. [Note: mezzo piano is a well-known Japanese children's clothing brand.]
If you have kids yourself, you'd probably get why that matters.
The people dogpiling her on X aren't exactly the target customers for kids' clothing anyway.
And apparently, if what's actually flagged here is a child-safety policy violation, it's basically impossible to get overturned.
Honestly, slapping an age restriction on this can only be called crazy, so it'll probably get lifted.
Background and Key Points
YouTube “demonetization” of this kind is usually not just a single video getting “limited ads” — it’s the much stronger measure of treating the entire channel as 18+ and cutting it off from ad sales, and once a channel is judged to have violated child-safety policy, the bar for a successful appeal is reportedly very high. Some posts in the thread treat the backlash over the recent collaboration project and the demonetization as one and the same event, but no one actually confirms any causal link between the two. The most anyone offers is speculation that the automated system may have scanned video titles or comment-section posts and issued a blanket “inappropriate” ruling — no official explanation from YouTube itself, from Shigure Ui, or from her agency appears anywhere in the thread. It’s also worth flagging that the line claiming the restriction is “mainly due to strict automated policy enforcement around child protection and sexual content” appears to be a poster’s own guess rather than a confirmed, official statement from YouTube.
※This article is compiled from excerpts and a summary of the 5channel (Newsspeed VIP) thread “[Sad News] Shigure Ui, Demonetized.”
Leave a Reply