Is the Rise of Non-Regular Employment Just ‘Self-Responsibility’? 5ch: ‘I Could Only Save 3,000 Yen’

From our other sites

The story

Many people who entered the workforce during Japan’s “employment ice age” after the bubble economy collapsed are still stuck in unstable, non-regular jobs today. On ABEMA Prime, a debate erupted over how deregulation—including revisions to the Worker Dispatch Law—fueled the rise of non-regular employment, with some arguing “government policy at the time expanded it” while others pinned the blame on individual “self-responsibility.” On a 5ch thread, voices from that generation (“Back then, becoming a civil servant was the only way out”) sat alongside accounts like “I’m from the same ice age generation, but I worked at a black company and could only save 3,000 yen,” highlighting the gap between lived experience and calls for self-responsibility.

Published 9/23 (Wed) 11:00

ABEMA TIMES

Many of those who entered society during the employment ice age after the bubble burst remain stuck in unstable non-regular employment today. Amid revisions to the Worker Dispatch Law and other changes that expanded the ranks of non-regular workers, sharp voices have clashed—some arguing “government policy at the time expanded non-regular employment,” others leveling harsh “self-responsibility” criticism at the workers themselves. ABEMA Prime held a discussion on the roots of this problem, where responsibility lies, and what support should look like going forward.

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

6AnonymousSep 23, 2026 16:59
2.6 million yen a year? lol, most other countries in Asia have already overtaken that.
97AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:30
Re: #6
>"7x the pay compared to Indonesia" — foreign workers in Kagoshima quadruple over 10 years, the reality of a region propping up an area whose population has dropped below 1.5 million
Even with this weak yen, apparently workers from the bottom rung in Indonesia can make 7x more by coming to Kagoshima.

Well, for people actually working properly in the big cities, they've probably already been overtaken almost across the board though.
7AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:00
I switched to blue-collar work early on — that decision was the right one.
36AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:12
Re: #7
Koizumi cut public works spending, and even major general contractors were going bankrupt back then.
152AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:41
Re: #7
There are quite a few college grads working as delivery drivers, and honestly I think that's a pretty solid choice.
18AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:06
Wasn't regular employment among the ice age generation something like 90%?
32AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:11
Re: #18
I'm 53, went to a bottom-tier ("F-rank") university, but among my friends and their circles, there's basically nobody who's non-regular…
20AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:06
"Huh? You're still a salaryman? That makes you a loser. Self-responsibility."


…says some unemployed guy with zero work history who just inherited a massive fortune and land from his parents. When a guy like that hits you with "self-responsibility" — like "if you're jealous, why didn't you just make the effort to live off unearned income?" — it makes me want to kill someone.


What even is this "self-responsibility" thing? "Not enough effort," whatever.
28AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:09
Re: #20
Gen Z is saying the exact same thing:

"Job hunting was easy for us, but even during the ice age, if you'd just tried hard, getting a job would've been easy too, right?"
35AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:12
Once the generation with no retirement severance starts hitting retirement age, isn't this problem going to get way bigger?
41AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:13

42AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:14
Normally the sensible move would've been to lay off the high-paid employees who weren't producing results and hire young people instead — cheaper and with more upside potential. But the age group that would've been targeted for layoffs back then was the generation with a track record of raising hell in the student movements. Make an enemy of them carelessly and you'd be at a disadvantage come election time. Even in an era with no internet like today, those guys were still networked together.
71AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:23
Re: #42
The parents of the ice age generation are that very baby boomer generation.
45AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:15
If they hadn't expanded non-regular employment, it would've been a parade of unemployment. People would've been struggling just to eat, with nothing left but suicide. The non-regular poor should be thanking the LDP for saving their lives.
52AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:17
Re: #45
Part-timers, temp workers, and fixed-term factory workers just got replaced by dispatch workers, that's all. There weren't enough seats to begin with, so it couldn't be helped.
53AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:18
Re: #45
Mostly agree, but at the same time they should've eased dismissal regulations for regular employees too.
51AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:17
Pinning "self-responsibility" on the ice age generation, come on. At the first company I joined, there wasn't a single other person with my level of education. When I was the new guy, I got told over and over, "Why'd you come to a small-fry place like this? lol" Back then, becoming a civil servant was the only way out.
169AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:44
Re: #51
The first company I joined was basically a yakuza front business. Well, it paid pretty well on commission though.
60AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:20
Re: #52
Creating jobs ("seats") is the government's job. Takenaka [Heizo, the economist behind labor deregulation] was incompetent on that front, but it's not really his fault.
68AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:23
Re: #60
That's about civil servant positions ("seats"). Even under the DPJ government, [Katsuya] Okada talked about cutting hiring numbers. Private-sector jobs come down to economic growth and respecting individual workers' rights, but in Japan there's a tendency to only recognize workers collectively, through unions.
77AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:26
I can say this now, but the ice age generation / Gen X was deliberately being bullied, you know.
80AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:26
Re: #77
That's "unrestricted warfare" (a Chinese military strategy concept meaning total, no-holds-barred conflict).
82AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:26
If you're in your 40s or 50s and have less than 1 million yen saved, I think that's on you. People like that shouldn't get welfare. I'm from the same ice age generation, but I worked at a black company (a firm notorious for exploitative labor practices) and scrimped for my old age the whole time — and I've saved 3,000 yen.
93AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:29
Re: #82
Don't act so proud about 3,000 yen.
98AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:30
Re: #82
3,000 yen is rough, lol.
89AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:28
If you're not getting hired as a regular employee, it's because you lack the aptitude or ability for the job. All you can do is get a qualification and go to a company that'll hire you as a regular employee.
102AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:31
Re: #89
I got fired up and thought, "I'll get my slinging and forklift licenses and cling on as a regular employee even at some bottom-tier warehouse!!"
But then: "Do you have practical experience?" "Even with the license, we don't have the spare capacity to train you from zero."
And I'd get turned away at the door. That's what it was like back then.


These days, with the labor shortage, it's: "Oh! You've got the license?! We've been waiting for you! You'll be fine just picking it up as you go!" — and you get hired on the spot.
115AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:34
Re: #102
Yeah, back then they'd hire carpenters who happened to have law licenses.
126AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:37
Re: #102
That's why you pick a field where your past experience actually counts. Mid-career regular hiring only takes people with experience. The only ones hired as regular employees without experience are new grads and young people.
131AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:38
By the time the ice age generation hit middle age, almost all of them became regular employees. Bringing up "non-regular ice age generation" at this point is off the mark. The ones from that generation who are still non-regular today are mostly housewives working part-time jobs. Stop repeating the "non-regular ice age generation" narrative by citing a tiny minority of non-regular middle-aged men as your example.
140AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:40
Re: #131
Lol, you're straight up dissing the part-timer at my warehouse.
167AnonymousSep 23, 2026 17:44
Re: #131
Even if you become a regular employee by the time you're middle-aged, you can't exactly start a family by then.

Background and Key Points of This Debate

The Worker Dispatch Law was revised in 1999, lifting restrictions to allow dispatch labor across most job categories in principle, and in 2004 dispatch work was further deregulated to include manufacturing. The employment ice age (roughly those who graduated between 1993 and 2004) overlapped with this period of deregulation, meaning the generation left out of the traditional new-graduate hiring track was especially likely to end up funneled into non-regular employment. Since around 2019, the government has pushed an “Ice Age Generation Support Program,” but its track record of converting workers to regular employment is considered limited. In the thread, criticism of Heizo Takenaka — who spearheaded the deregulation — clashes with “self-responsibility” arguments that focus on individual choices, making this an issue that doesn’t reduce neatly to simple right and wrong. One commonly misunderstood point: not everyone from the ice age generation remained non-regular — many did eventually move into regular employment as they aged — but the segment that reaches retirement age still non-regular faces a real looming problem of inadequate pensions and retirement savings, which remains an unresolved social security challenge.

*This article is compiled and summarized from the 5ch (News Speed+) thread “Was the Expansion of ‘Non-Regular Employment’ That Plagues the Ice Age Generation Really a Bad Thing? Those Affected and Experts Push Back Against the ‘Self-Responsibility’ Argument.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *