From our other sites
The story
Reports say Shizuoka Prefecture is in the final stages of coordinating a policy that would require reckless climbers who attempt Mt. Fuji in winter and end up needing rescue to pay a financial penalty. During the harshest winter months, Mt. Fuji’s official trails are closed, but climbing isn’t legally banned outright — it’s simply treated as “climb at your own risk.” The four cities and one town at the base of the mountain on the Shizuoka side have already requested that paid access be considered, and this latest move builds on that push. On the 5ch thread, posters floated ideas like folding insurance costs into an entry fee or setting steep rescue fees, while others questioned whether charging foreign tourists would actually work, what happens if someone refuses to pay, and why Yamanashi Prefecture isn’t on the same page.
September 11, 2026, 3:01 PM
In an effort to cut down on rescue operations carried out under the brutal conditions of Mt. Fuji in winter, Shizuoka Prefecture has entered final coordination on a deterrent policy that would impose financial costs on reckless climbers.
Several senior Shizuoka Prefecture officials revealed this on the 10th.
Source: news.livedoor.com / Original article here
What people said
Anyone who doesn't pay gets hit with a punitive bill.
With that one-two punch, nobody could complain.
Yeah, you can.
It's only "closed" in the sense that they say so — there's no actual ban.
This isn't the kind of thing sports news would even cover.
These are people who don't follow the rules to begin with.
Same here — without a real penalty spelled out for non-payment, the whole thing turns into a sieve.
It's not the kind of amount you pay in cash, so people will just come up with excuses to ignore it and let it slide.
They're apparently moving toward charging fees too.
For anyone who hasn't paid the entry fee,
the insurance simply won't cover them — bill them the full cost instead.
Use that money to properly compensate the mountain cleanup crews and rescue teams.
Isn't it already a paid site?
We're talking about Mt. Fuji here.
Then go climb a different mountain.
There's no rule saying your climbing skills can't improve unless you specifically climb Mt. Fuji.
That's exactly what's happening now — that's why they're talking about penalties for people who call for rescue.
Yeah, it needs to be the kind of mountain where failure means death, and you go up knowing that.
It's on them — they knew the risk.
Re: #44
Doing that would require a constitutional amendment.
Apparently public rescue services aren't allowed to refuse a rescue.
That's why they're drafting a new rule instead.
That won't happen unless Nagano, Gifu, and Toyama all get on the same page.
For the Northern Alps, maybe just limit it to Mt. Hotaka?
The other peaks up there don't have nearly as many deaths.
Then go ahead and do it.
Go petition all three prefectures yourself then.
Being stranded/lost isn't only about losing the trail, you know.
That's not some obscure trivia — it's common sense, so remember it.
And since refusing to help is morally unacceptable, charging money is the only option.
Why is everyone dragging their feet on this?
When it comes to Mt. Fuji, the problem is Yamanashi acting like it's not their business.
The people putting rescue teams in danger by ignoring the rules are the ones being morally unacceptable — and it's a waste of money too.
Just ignore people like that and let them die.
Only help the ones who can pay the rescue cost upfront.
Background and Key Points of This Story
What’s actually confirmed in the article is only that Shizuoka Prefecture has entered final coordination on a policy direction of “seeking financial payment” — details like scope, amounts, and what happens if someone refuses to pay haven’t been disclosed. Debate on the thread centered mainly on whether this would actually work: some proposed folding insurance into the entry fee or setting steep rescue costs, while others repeatedly raised doubts about people dodging payment and about how much can realistically be enforced on foreign tourists. The thread also confirmed that even though Mt. Fuji’s official trails are closed in winter, climbing isn’t legally prohibited — it remains a “climb at your own risk” situation. Some also pointed out that Shizuoka and Yamanashi aren’t coordinated on this, meaning how effective the policy ends up being will depend heavily on how the final rules are designed.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Entertainment & Sports News+) thread “Shizuoka Prefecture in final coordination on charging financial penalties for reckless winter climbs on Mt. Fuji — four cities and one town at the base requested paid access.”
Leave a Reply