From our other sites
The story
An ABEMA TIMES article about a future society where “half of people have no spouse” became a hot topic on 5ch’s Newsspeed+ (News Speed+) board. In the thread, opinions split along generational and personal lines — from financial gripes like “I’d marry if I had the money,” to accounts of the liberating feeling after divorce, to questions about the link between non-regular employment and marriage.
Is a society where “half of people have no spouse” just around the corner? What does Japan’s future of “more people not marrying” look like… Experts weigh in: “Building a society that doesn’t depend on children could, paradoxically, increase the number of children”
Thu, 8/27, 11:00 AM JST
ABEMA TIMES
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
It's precisely because you don't have money that you get married — two incomes make one full income. These days, unless you work for a seriously good company, your testicles or ovaries will have already rotted away by the time a single income could support you.
Call it an old-fashioned value if you want, but we shouldn't have thrown away the idea that you're only truly a full-fledged adult once you're married.
That's on married people who never actually grew up. Please go be a proper adult (´・ω・`)
If you earn a reasonable amount, you can live a reasonably fun life. I'm nearly 50 and got my motorcycle and boat licenses — started going fishing and camping, picked up all sorts of new hobbies.
What's someone supposed to do if they just want to be a "Category 3 insured person" (a dependent spouse who pays no pension premiums but still gets pension credit)?
People like that should just move to some Islamic country and settle in as, say, a third wife. Japan itself had concubines listed in the family register up through the early Meiji era, so I think it'd be fine to bring that back. If a man has the money and can love them all equally, why not allow polygamy?
Congrats! Being stuck married when you don't get along is rough.
I don't know anyone else who's as much of a true winner as you.
Though a broke parent playing the "I have kids so I'm special" card is way worse.
Once you give birth, you're on the hook for child support forever.
This whole "age of diversity" thing is just an illusion.
Among men especially there are a lot of socially awkward weird types, but men who've been single their whole lives are pretty seriously odd — basically all of them are the type who are better off not forcing themselves to deal with other people and just living freely on their own.
Which is why most people go ahead and have kids anyway.
There's no "starting over" in life. Life is what you've built up along the way.
Older singles who can't get married even past 40 tend to share the same traits: stingy, only thinking about themselves, and egoists incapable of consideration for others.
Past 30 I got lonely and got married. Now I come home from work and there's someone waiting with dinner made — what a happy thing that is.
Re: #168
That generation was still pretty proactive.
The marriage rate had already been falling before the Ice Age generation. It's almost certain that generations after the Ice Age cohort will end up with an even higher lifetime unmarried rate than the Ice Age generation itself. It's simply not true that only the Ice Age generation isn't marrying or having kids — if anything, the birth rate actually recovered while the latter half of that generation was having children. So no matter what the government does, it can't reverse the trend of falling birthrates and rising non-marriage. Every developed country is the same way.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Speed+) thread “Is a society where half of people have no spouse just around the corner? What does Japan’s future of more people not marrying look like…”.
Leave a Reply