Court Orders WECARS to Pay Damages Over Car That Failed Inspection Standards — 5ch: ‘Just Changed the Sign, Same Old Inside’

From our other sites

The story

WECARS, a used-car dealership in Saijo, Ehime Prefecture that took over the business of the former Bigmotor, has been found to have sold a customer a used car that didn’t meet vehicle inspection (shaken) standards. On July 30, the Saijo Branch of the Matsuyama District Court ruled that “the seller has an obligation to deliver a vehicle that passes inspection,” finding WECARS in breach of contract and ordering it to pay 270,000 yen. The contract was reportedly signed just two months after the business changeover. On 5ch, many pointed out that even though the parent company changed to one affiliated with Itochu Corporation, the staff and culture on the ground haven’t changed, with opinions divided over the significance of the ruling and whether the damages amount was appropriate.

TV Ehime

Friday, September 25, 2026, 6:55 PM

The man bought the used car two months after “WECARS” took over the former Bigmotor’s business,

Source: fnn.jp / Original article here

What people said

2AnonymousSep 26, 2026 06:48
The people working inside are the same, so of course nothing's gonna change
Itochu is seriously underestimating the guys entrenched in the used-car industry
4AnonymousSep 26, 2026 07:10
Re: #2
Trading companies are pretty much the same anyway
3AnonymousSep 26, 2026 06:55
>On July 30, the Matsuyama District Court's Saijo Branch ruled that 'the seller has an obligation to deliver a car that meets inspection standards,' finding a breach of contract.

Landmark ruling — used car dealers are done for lol
13AnonymousSep 26, 2026 10:38
Re: #3
I want WECARS to appeal all the way to the Supreme Court and get this locked in as precedent
5AnonymousSep 26, 2026 07:24
A country where the executives who ran the show never get arrested
6AnonymousSep 26, 2026 08:10
The insurance industry finally got its karma with Bigmotor
9AnonymousSep 26, 2026 08:21
Re: #6
No worries, they'll just make up the losses by hiking premiums
7AnonymousSep 26, 2026 08:13
Why would anyone still buy a car from Bigmotor?
8AnonymousSep 26, 2026 08:17
Re: #7
People probably figure things changed since the management did
But the sales and maintenance staff weren't all replaced, so the ones who got their hands dirty aren't changing anytime soon
10AnonymousSep 26, 2026 09:13
Not a single word about this on their website or social media lol
12AnonymousSep 26, 2026 10:31
The name changed but the staff inside didn't, so they'll just keep repeating the same mistakes
14AnonymousSep 26, 2026 10:39
Honestly, I don't think Bigmotor's really at fault this time

It's pretty normal for a super-expensive import like a Maserati to have a muffler that doesn't meet domestic standards
If anything, the salesperson was just ignorant
20AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:41
Re: #14
A friend of mine drives a Levante with the unmodified Ferrari-built V6 twin-turbo, and it's already pretty loud lol
27AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:19
Re: #14
If the salesperson's at fault,
then the company's at fault
34AnonymousSep 26, 2026 15:51
Re: #14
That just means it's a completely untrustworthy company
15AnonymousSep 26, 2026 10:41
Wasn't it just a name change from Bigmotor?
Definitely not a place you should be buying from
16AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:15
Re: #14
( ´,_ゝ`)プッ (a smug snicker face — basically 'pfft, sure')
17AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:31
They just changed the sign and nothing inside actually changed, so of course fraud like this keeps happening
18AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:33
Even for a Maserati, demanding 2.9 million yen in damages is a bit of a rip-off lol
19AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:36
They probably went through all sorts of negotiations before it went to court, got branded as thugs, and the customer's anger maxed out. A company nobody would miss if it folded lol
21AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:42
I wonder if the 270,000 yen payment order is just the cost of swapping in a genuine muffler
22AnonymousSep 26, 2026 11:54
So 270,000 yen is all it takes to pass inspection, huh.
25AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:11
Itochu talking about 'the way of the merchant' is hilarious. Quite the bargain-bin code of honor — a 500-yen QUO gift card.
There's no way you get a fresh start by making the customer just swallow the loss.
26AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:11
Feels like flood-damaged used cars are on the rise
28AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:24
Nothing's changed at the root of it
Just go under already
29AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:32
Sounds like the previous owner sold the car with a modified high-power muffler still attached while the inspection was still valid, and it got passed straight on to the customer as-is.
Since you need a genuine muffler to pass inspection, that's where the dispute came from
30AnonymousSep 26, 2026 12:36
Organizational culture doesn't change that easily
31AnonymousSep 26, 2026 13:08
The strength of DNA that's been carved in deep
33AnonymousSep 26, 2026 15:22
Won't work unless they broaden the scope of fines and double the amounts
36AnonymousSep 26, 2026 17:31
Do you actually get arrested for selling cars 'as-is' or with expired inspections?
Rough business, being a used car dealer
38AnonymousSep 26, 2026 19:46
Re: #36
It's a civil case
Selling a car that fails inspection without disclosing it is obviously a problem
42AnonymousSep 26, 2026 22:40
Re: #36
If it's got plates, you're paying inspection fees based on the remaining validity period
so if it was already non-compliant at that point, that's fraud
37AnonymousSep 26, 2026 19:43
The weed-choked sidewalk-and-bike-path along the national road
was immaculately tidy with not a single blade of grass
right in front of the Bigmotor store — I really can't thank them enough (sarcasm — a jab at the scandal where Bigmotor was found to have killed roadside trees and weeds near its stores)
Meanwhile the local government is utterly useless
39AnonymousSep 26, 2026 20:27
Actually, the muffler was already replaced for free at the customer's request
The dispute blew up because they then demanded 2.9 million yen in damages on top of a car that sold for 2.9 million yen
40AnonymousSep 26, 2026 22:00
So it really was just a sign change, huh (mock old-timey speech for comic effect)
41AnonymousSep 26, 2026 22:06
Prices are high when they're selling
and high when they're buying too lol
43AnonymousSep 26, 2026 22:41
Only the sign changed
the inside didn't
Yeah, this isn't good…

Background and Key Points of This Story

WECARS is said to have been formed when Itochu Corporation and others took over the business of the former Bigmotor, whose management collapsed amid the insurance fraud scandal. This ruling recognized a basic breach of contract — that a seller is obligated to deliver a vehicle that meets inspection standards — and the fact that it happened just two months after the business changeover has drawn particular attention. On 5ch, some speculated that the 270,000 yen payment order corresponds to the cost of fitting a genuine replacement muffler, suggesting it may be a different kind of figure from the 2.9 million yen damages claim that also drew attention elsewhere. The central debate centered on the argument that “fraud will keep repeating unless the staff and culture on the ground change, no matter how much the parent company or the sign out front changes,” with opinions split between those welcoming the ruling and those questioning Itochu’s response and accountability.

*This article is compiled as an excerpt and summary from the 5ch (Business News+) thread “Sale of a “car that fails inspection standards” in Saijo — Payment order against WECARS, two months after taking over former Bigmotor’s business [Ehime].”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *