From our other sites
The story
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said on a podcast with Stripe co-founder John Collison that “it’s a problem for individual PCs to carry huge amounts of DRAM.” The comment came up during a discussion about whether the spread of local AI might reduce dependence on data centers — Altman argued that running AI in the cloud around the clock makes more sense from a resource-allocation standpoint. After Techno Edge wrote this up and it reached 5ch, the News Flash+ board lit up with pushback on the pro-cloud remark, citing frustration over soaring memory prices, the existence of “Strata,” a new technology that runs local AI, and China’s local AI efforts closing the gap. Reactions split between those who read the comment as an argument for dictatorial resource allocation and those who saw it more calmly as just a CEO stating his position.
OpenAI CEO Altman says “putting large amounts of RAM in a PC is a problem.” Argues local AI should take a back seat to “using the cloud around the clock” | Techno Edge
2026 Oct 31 16:30 Munenori Taniguchi
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, appearing on a podcast hosted by Stripe co-founder John Collison, pointed out that “there’s a problem with individual PCs carrying large amounts of DRAM.” The remark came up when the conversation turned to whether the spread of local AI might reduce reliance on data centers.
Source: techno-edge.net / Read the original article here
What people said
For personal use, 16GB is plenty.
That's about all PCs need these days.
Upgrade cycles keep stretching out and sales are dropping from price hikes too — doesn't seem like it'd hurt OpenAI much either way.
Pretty common for 'geniuses.'
Altman isn't some genius AI researcher though.
So basically he'd rather have a centralized, totalitarian society than resource-inefficient capitalism and free markets?
This guy's got real dictator energy.
Re: #26
Come on over to Tokyo
Tokyo's a great place
The sake's good
And the girls are pretty
(riffing on a classic enka lyric)
Poor 'ubiquitous' never had a chance.
On-premise: 'You rang?'
Whatever happened to Web 2.0?
Sounds exactly like the farm co-op hoarding rice.
Semiconductor profit margins make this whole thing look absurd.
It's insane that everyone knows the spending is reckless but nobody can stop pouring money in.
Maybe they should just ask AI whether any of this actually makes sense.
Physical AI (robotics-focused AI) doesn't mean much if it's not local anyway.
The compute for physical AI is built right into the robot or device itself.
I assumed it ran over the internet.
Don't draw sweeping conclusions from a temporary blip.
Altman's always been about extreme statements.
That's probably how he's hustled money and people like a con artist this whole time.
15 years ago 8GB cost like 3,000 yen (~$20) — civilization has regressed way too far.
Civilization's advancing just fine.
It's just more profitable to price for enterprise capex than to bother with trash-tier retail customers.
Running it locally, it's all exposed too.
If anything, isn't China heading the same direction?
Cloud lets you keep tabs on the population after all.
China hands over its source outright, so it's actually well-suited for LLMs.
Re: #85
Though Chinese-made AI will tell you the Senkaku Islands have always been Chinese territory, and it keeps sending the Chinese Communist Party data on who's asking what, lol.
Thin clients, wasn't it?
Ken Kutaragi, the father of Sony's PlayStation, was actually aiming for the cloud.
That's why he built the Cell processor for the PS3.
Though it ran at a loss and got killed off, lol.
I'd get it if they rejected all censorship outright, but…
There's probably a bunch of ban risks beyond just porn too.
Interesting, had no idea.
Thanks for the heads up.
Shocked at how expensive it is! Isn't that like 10 times what it used to be?
More like 4 times, I'd say.
AI demand has made things brutal, so smug comments like this really piss me off.
*Closed, more like.
They're losing because they keep clamping down on porn in the cloud.
History will probably record this as losing the war to overzealous compliance.
If anything this makes it worse.
They just want to hoover up data with AI and monopolize it.
Background and key points of this discussion
Altman’s remark comes against a backdrop of rising semiconductor prices driven by surging AI-related DRAM demand. The thread was full of firsthand complaints about 32GB memory price hikes, and from a user’s perspective, the “pick the cloud” comment read as prioritizing corporate capital spending. Meanwhile, options that don’t assume cloud dependence are growing for local AI too — including “Strata,” a new low-VRAM technology, and the improving performance of Chinese-made models. How much of Altman’s argument is technical inevitability versus simply serving OpenAI’s business interests is worth separating out. Reactions in the thread split between reading the remark as a dictatorial take on resource allocation and calmly viewing it as just one CEO’s statement — no single verdict emerged.
※This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Flash+) thread “OpenAI CEO Altman says “it’s a problem to put large amounts of RAM in a personal PC,” argues local AI should give way to “using the cloud around the clock”.”


Leave a Reply