From our other sites
The story
A thread was started using the premise “Let’s say the PS6 becomes a high-performance handheld” as a springboard, asking neutral observers to predict how it would fare. Many people brought up the Vita and PSP, and the discussion centered less on raw performance than on whether Sony — reliant on third parties — could actually secure enough games for a handheld. Pessimistic takes stood out, citing pricing, heat, and battery constraints that would make it a tough sell whether it’s priced above or below the Switch 2, with alternative ideas like a cloud-only model or a UMPC-style approach also surfacing.
What people said
They couldn't even stock the PS5 with games,
so of course this won't sell.
it could land in that same unique spot the PSP had back in the DS era.
So basically, a Vita.
A PS6 would be expected to outperform the PS5, and once you factor in heat dissipation, the price is bound to climb (even the Switch, which is only a bit more powerful than the Wii U, costs over 30,000 yen).
Nintendo has settled into a low-performance niche, but making the PS6 a handheld seems like a bad move.
Are there really enough enthusiasts out there willing to pay over 100,000 yen for a handheld?
to justify starting a poll thread asking for opinions like this.
Even though the Switch sold huge in its first year, third parties only started development around launch, and their big titles are just now finally coming out.
For a third-party-dependent PlayStation to release an ultra-high-performance handheld that doesn't lend itself well to multiplatform releases with PC — that's a guaranteed software famine.
Either way, going the high-performance route makes a software shortage unavoidable.
It's an even tougher ask than a laptop trying to compete with a desktop.
Falling behind on raw power means that for a Sony that's 100% dependent on third parties, the games dry up.
In other words, they'd self-destruct from software famine.
probably like a laptop with the keyboard removed.
Priced below the Switch → specs fall below the Switch, making a PlayStation handheld pointless, so games stop coming and it dies.
Then again, dying from lack of games is basically the status quo already.
More than that, the existence of UMPCs already tips most of the hand before a handheld even ships.
but in reality, it looks like consoles getting wiped out by PCs is going to happen first.
— selling a small volume at a high price.
Dock it and you get access to a GV-N3090IXEB-24GD eGPU for high performance.
Price: 400,000 yen, basically a PC, but PS games run on it too.
Something like that.
And then flop spectacularly.
I'm looking forward to it.
And they really need to ramp up advertising, don't they?
Nintendo inevitably becomes the comparison point, but
PlayStation barely runs any TV ads,
and when they do, they're kind of baffling.
First-party needs to make the games
and actually go out and sell them.
once you're a handheld, no matter how hard you try, differentiating on raw performance just isn't possible.
If the question is whether it can beat the Switch 2, that's 100% impossible.
Reasons:
size, weight, pricing, battery problems, no games, digital-download-only, the decline of the PlayStation brand, and so on.
Someone who doesn't own any games?
The Switch 2, despite pushing hard on performance, still only lands at roughly a generation behind, which shows that making something portable inevitably costs you performance.
So even if it's 'high-performance' as handhelds go, it'll still be weaker than a home console, and I don't think there's much demand for that among PlayStation's crowd.
so things can only get worse from here, never better.
Or it's about 5cm thick.
Background and Key Points of Debate
Nintendo has consolidated its Switch line around the handheld format, while Sony has instead relied on home consoles plus PSVR and cloud streaming via PS Plus Premium to cover the “portable” experience. The PS Vita is the precedent many commenters are drawing on: it launched touting high performance but was discontinued after third-party software support dried up. The debate here splits into two main threads. One is a technical argument that going handheld inherently means falling short of home-console performance. The other is a practical one about price, heat, and battery constraints. Neither point stems from any official announcement — the thread title’s premise, “the PS6 becomes a high-performance handheld,” is purely hypothetical, and there is no indication that Sony actually has such a product in the works.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Hardware/Industry [Geha]) thread “Asking neutral parties: If ‘the PS6 becomes a high-performance handheld,’ how do you think it would fare?“
Leave a Reply