Amazon Weighing 12 Small Nuclear Reactors in the US — 5ch: ‘Build One in Tokyo’

From our other sites

The story

On October 19, 2026, Amazon announced it is considering building 12 small modular reactors (SMRs) in Indiana, USA. Working with reactor developer X-energy and utility American Electric Power (AEP), the plan targets a combined output of 960,000 kW to power the local grid and data centers in the region. On 5ch, a thread lit up with jokes about where such a reactor would go if built in Japan (“Tokyo or Osaka?”), concerns over uranium supply and safety, and surprised comments like “Wait, isn’t Amazon supposed to be just an online bookstore? Now it’s building nuclear plants?”

On October 19, Amazon announced it is considering building 12 small modular reactors (SMRs) in Indiana, USA.

Working with reactor developer X-energy and utility American Electric Power (AEP),

the plan targets a combined output of 960,000 kW (960 MW). The electricity generated would supply the local power grid and Amazon’s data centers.

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

3AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:48
Build one in Osaka too, Japan
66AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:06
Re: #3
Tokyo uses a ton of power, so it'd make more sense to build it there
93AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:17
Re: #3
Maybe right next door to your house would be best
127AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:34
Re: #3Re: #66
Osaka needs it since it's actively courting data centers

All-out push to attract data centers: Osaka forms a public-private group, backs NTT's new facility permits
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUF09C150Z01C26A0000000/
4AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:48
Ugh, they're using that silly 'tens of thousands of kilowatts' notation again
59AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:05
Re: #4
1.21 jigowatts (a pun on the famous 'Back to the Future' mistranslation of gigawatt as 'jigowatt')
140AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:40
Re: #4
Well, food uses kilocalories as the everyday unit too

so it makes sense that kilowatts are the standard everyday unit for electricity too
5AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:48
Thread where someone posts parody ads for home-use small reactors (´・ω・`)
173AnonymousOct 20, 2026 14:10
Re: #5
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/33/f3/93/33f393ada3ba26c2e61f4d3d2ffb8a28.jpg
7AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:49
Does human society really need data that requires 12 reactors to run?
20AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:53
Re: #7
Amazon needs it
141AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:41
Re: #7
These are small modular reactors (SMRs), so output per unit is lower than a conventional reactor.
The advantage of going smaller is a larger surface-area-to-volume ratio for heat dissipation, which even allows air cooling in emergencies.
9AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:49
Put a small reactor in Tokyo!
13AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:51
Re: #9
Odaiba would be perfect — the Museum of Maritime Science is gone, the hot spring's gone, and so are the Gundam statue, Venus Fort, the Ferris wheel, and the Toyota showroom
111AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:25
Re: #9
There used to be an experimental reactor in Saitama's Shintoshin district
175AnonymousOct 20, 2026 14:10
Re: #9
Yokosuka already has one — or rather, lives with one — so it's a bit late to ask now
15AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:52
Sea temperatures will just keep rising and worsen global warming — they should just build the data centers underwater instead
50AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:02
Re: #15
Apparently shellfish and other stuff end up sticking to them, making maintenance a pain
22AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:53
The question is whether it'll even get approved
169AnonymousOct 20, 2026 14:07
Re: #22
It's news precisely because approval looks likely
29AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:55
A world where fusion power is the norm will probably only arrive after everyone here is dead
Even then, there'll probably still be anti-fusion-power activists
142AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:41
Re: #29
So the fusion power from SimCity is becoming reality?
What about microwave power transmission?
34AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:56
Honestly, I think it'd be fine to put small reactors right in the city center
They're safe, and there's no transmission loss
40AnonymousOct 20, 2026 12:57
Re: #34
At least keep it to the Tokyo Bay waterfront
208AnonymousOct 20, 2026 14:43
Re: #34
Seriously, I'd want one right in front of the Prime Minister's office
48AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:01
They really need to attract data centers and small reactors as a package deal
But can uranium reserves actually keep up with supply?
60AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:05
Re: #48
There's a uranium mine out in some rundown Canadian backwater — population was like single digits, I think
70AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:07
Re: #48
I recall hearing it's about a 150-year supply.
Uranium's also dissolved in seawater, and once extraction from that becomes viable,
supply concerns are supposed to go away entirely.
74AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:08
Re: #48
Wait, don't small reactors run on plutonium?
62AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:05
Doesn't look like anyone's thought through the risk if something goes wrong
63AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:06
Re: #62
Thing is, this design doesn't have accidents
139AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:40
Just the other day it was an online bookstore
And now it's building nuclear power plants
153AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:45
Re: #139
The actual development is being done by another company though
159AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:49
Re: #139
Companies owning their own power plants is nothing new — there've been tons of them for ages
152AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:45
I get why going smaller makes sense for safety and post-decommissioning handling,
but the reason reactors got bigger in the first place
is that bigger is fundamentally more thermally efficient.

Uranium, the fuel for nuclear power, isn't actually that abundant a resource,
so isn't it a problem if small reactors become the trend?
156AnonymousOct 20, 2026 13:47
Re: #152
It's costly, but you can also extract it from seawater

Background and Key Points of This Topic

Amid surging electricity demand from AI data centers, Amazon and other major US tech companies have increasingly turned to nuclear power to secure their energy supply. The SMR design at issue here is X-energy’s Xe-100, which uses TRISO fuel (high-assay low-enriched uranium) rather than plutonium. While the thread was full of jokes about where such a reactor might be sited, opinions split between concerns over uranium depletion and the view that seawater-extraction technology could offset it. It’s also worth noting that Amazon itself won’t own or develop the reactors — it will receive power through contracts with the utility and the reactor developer — a distinction that wasn’t fully appreciated in the thread.

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Flash+) thread “Amazon Considers Building 12 Small Reactors in US to Power Data Centers and More.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *