From our other sites
The story
As a countermeasure against anonymous, fluid crime groups (“tokuryu”), an expert panel convened by the National Police Agency finalized a proposal on September 24 to introduce “remote analysis” — a method of externally retrieving the communication contents of smartphones. The NPA is expected to submit a related bill amending the Police Duties Execution Act to the extraordinary Diet session set to convene in October. Under the proposal, the practice would be limited to communication records on devices connected to a crime, and would require both a judge’s warrant and after-the-fact confirmation by the Public Safety Commission. On 5ch, opinion split between those who feared this “could turn Japan into something like today’s Chinese Communist Party, let alone the prewar Peace Preservation Law,” and those who argued that critics “should offer an alternative for fighting tokuryu crime” — leaving users divided over whether public safety or privacy should take priority.
The Unease Surrounding Police “Remote Smartphone Analysis”: Concerns Over Rights Violations, “Could Bring Back Conditions Like the Prewar Peace Preservation Law” — Tokyo Shimbun Digital
September 25, 2026, 5:00 AM — Article for paying subscribers only
Citing the urgent need to prevent harm caused by anonymous, fluid crime groups (“tokuryu”), an expert panel convened by the National Police Agency — which has been discussing “remote analysis,” a method for retrieving communication contents from smartphones — finalized a proposal on the 24th to introduce the system. In response, the NPA is expected to submit a bill amending the related Police Duties Execution Act, which would set the rules for remote analysis, to the extraordinary Diet session set to convene in October. (By Narufumi Kitagawa)
Source: tokyo-np.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
People who've sworn loyalty to some terrorist leader
and sing, dance, and chant 'hooray' for them, that kind of thing
That's how it starts, sure
but eventually the scope of remote analysis expands and you end up with a surveillance society
Same story with the consumption tax, immigration, and the renewable energy surcharge — people really ought to have learned by now
That phone of yours —
you'd be fine with the police taking it over?
Can you even trust the police? Says the guy who criticizes the Kanagawa Prefectural Police and the like!
Seems like you'd need an app built for that, or it just wouldn't work, right?
I wonder what kind of setup the Japanese police actually want to use here
Recently in the US, police were reportedly using license-plate tracking systems for personal reasons
Honestly, I'd think that's genuinely impressive.
It's been said its encryption is basically uncrackable, which is exactly why criminals and 'hangure' (semi-organized crime groups) have reportedly been using Telegram to hand out instructions for 'yami baito' (shady, crime-linked part-time gigs).
Yeah, exactly
calling it 'prewar' is what makes it feel unreal
saying 'today's Chinese Communist Party' hits a lot closer to home
Privacy is really only possible when you're completely offline, standalone
'Getting caught' assumes it's already a phone seized as evidence in a crime — if you're just living a normal life, your phone isn't getting confiscated.
I mean, you might get asked about it voluntarily during a police stop, but without actual evidence of a crime it's unlikely to lead to seizure.
Cell phones are basically the ultimate spy tool
They were originally military technology anyway
＞ Remote analysis targets only devices used for communication between perpetrators or with victims
＞ As a safeguard against violations of the secrecy of communications and privacy,
＞ a judge's warrant and after-the-fact confirmation by the Public Safety Commission will be made mandatory.
＞ If information outside the warrant's scope is handled during remote analysis,
＞ all of it will be deleted, and the device's user will be notified afterward.
The real problem is the phones belonging to fraud 'victims'…
I'd think victims would normally just hand over the messages themselves, saying 'this exchange is what scammed me.'
Apparently even with today's arrest warrants, if you file with a cooperative enough judge, you get one granted almost 100% of the time ❤ (that's '令嬢' — a typo/pun on '令状,' meaning 'warrant')
That's basically it, right
it's a legal revision meant to let them analyze the message logs from apps like Telegram and Signal on devices that have already been seized
it's not like they're trying to snoop through your other data folders lol
Signal's fine — not even the FBI could crack it no matter how hard they tried lol
In that case, why not just ban apps like that?
By the time that kind of info trickles down to us regular folks, it's already been sorted out
Re: #162
Why don't Japanese police make interrogations public or make body cameras mandatory?
At the very least, they should prove their own integrity before wielding this kind of power
What's the point of strengthening only the police's power in a country that won't even fulfill basic obligations like that and doesn't properly uphold separation of powers?
They're just tying their own hands lol
That comes only after they're seen setting an example the public actually recognizes
Like, transparency for the police organization — full disclosure after some set time period?
We need a system for citizens to keep watch over police overreach, but they won't even work on ending 'hostage justice' (prolonged pretrial detention used to pressure confessions) — an issue that's been raised for ages — or agree to record interrogations, so nothing's going to change.
An organization like that shouldn't be handed more power
If it stopped criticizing, it'd lose its reason to exist
Keeping watch over those in power is the media's job, isn't it
Background and Key Points of This Debate
The proposal’s scope covers only the communication records of seized devices confirmed to have been used for contact between perpetrators or with victims in a crime — it is not a system for constantly monitoring ordinary users’ smartphones. The planned procedures call for a judge’s warrant, after-the-fact confirmation by the Public Safety Commission, and the deletion of any information obtained outside the warrant’s scope along with notification to the device’s user — meaning operation is meant to stay within the bounds of the warrant system. On the thread, some worried about a slide toward a surveillance society, drawing comparisons to the “Peace Preservation Law” or the “Chinese Communist Party,” while others — pointing to the surge in tokuryu-driven fraud and “yami baito” robberies — argued that police investigative tools need to be strengthened. There was also praise for the police’s apparent success cracking encrypted apps like Telegram, and how to balance investigative capability with the protection of rights is set to be a focus of upcoming Diet deliberations.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Speed+) thread “The Unease Surrounding Police “Remote Smartphone Analysis”: Concerns Over Rights Violations, “Could Bring Back Conditions Like the Prewar Peace Preservation Law”.”
Leave a Reply