Buy a Car, Change Your World: 5ch Thread Says It Made Them Experts on Geography and Landmarks

From our other sites

The story

A post titled “After I bought a car, I got to know the geography, the landmarks, and all the good restaurants — my whole range of movement expanded” went up on 5ch’s Nandemo Jikkyo G board (a general live-chat board), drawing over 40 replies. The thread split over whether owning a car itself is what determines your range of movement, or whether the real factor is where you live — city versus countryside. One side argued that cities offer a dense living sphere even without a car, while the other insisted that in rural areas life simply doesn’t function without one — and the two sides never quite met in the middle.

What people said

1AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:31
Got to know the geography, the landmarks, tourist spots, all the good restaurants
My range of movement has expanded like crazy, it's amazing
Why the hell don't you guys buy one??
3AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:32
Women aren't really judging the car itself — they're judging that a guy with a narrow range of movement seems boring, right?
Now I get what women are actually trying to say
5AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:33
Re: #3
Yeah, that's probably true
A woman's idea of an "interesting guy" is "a guy who knows a ton of good restaurants"
It's definitely not a guy who's an expert on Android phones or gacha games
23AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:41
"A guy who owns a car" vs. "a guy who doesn't"
Which one's more popular with women? Plain as day
34AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:44
Re: #23
A car's a status symbol, after all
Money, paperwork, insurance — go through all that and you become a proper adult man
31AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:43
I get it
I drove a Prelude my old man forced on me for 20 years, but after I bought a Land Cruiser 300 through a friend's connection, my whole world changed
I can't go back to low-slung cars now lol
High-riding cars are just way easier to drive
Also my girlfriend responds way better to the big car
Women really do love a big car
37AnonymousSep 10, 2026 18:47
Re: #31
Sell me that Prelude
92AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:44
Re: #31
If a big car is all it takes, would my Hiace (Toyota van) work too?
49AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:09
If we're talking about range of movement, isn't where you live the more important factor?
The area you can cover in a city without a car is far denser than what you can cover in the countryside with one
50AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:09
Re: #49
Best of both worlds is living in the city AND owning a car though
54AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:12
Not having a car means my savings pile up. When I actually need to drive, a car-share works fine
56AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:13
Re: #54
So, what's your savings balance?
62AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:17
The one type of person I never want to become is someone like Re: #54

Money is a resource for getting experiences

Cutting experiences just to save money is putting the cart before the horse

There's zero value in having your assets peak the moment you die
57AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:14
If you're going out for good food, odds are you're drinking, so you wouldn't drive there anyway — especially with a woman along
58AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:15
Re: #57
Just don't drink then, simple as that
59AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:16
Re: #57
What a loser, drinking with a woman at night and then just heading straight home
66AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:20
It's true that "having a car is more convenient and expands your range of movement," but
depending on where you live, it can take your livability from 0 points to 50
while somewhere else it only goes from like 80 points to 85
After that it's just a question of cost-effectiveness
68AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:22
The problem is it takes too much time to get around
Trains are usually faster and easier anyway, and if you absolutely need a car, a rental works fine
70AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:24
Re: #68
That's only true if your destination happens to be near a station
71AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:24
Re: #66
For anyone outside central Tokyo, owning a car is just the default
The whole idea that "having a car is more convenient and expands your range" is exactly the kind of thing only a carless Tokyoite would say
73AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:25
Re: #71
If you think about it by population, cities have way more people
So the rural viewpoint is the minority one, isn't it?
79AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:29
Re: #73
Half the country's population lives in what's called the "regions"
Meaning anywhere outside the Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya metro areas
Saying it's "way more" is just wrong
80AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:30
Re: #73
That's why carless working adults are basically only a Tokyo-central-wards thing
I mean, even within Tokyo, once you're outside the 23 wards, isn't owning a car the norm even for Tokyo residents?
Anywhere in the Kanto region besides Tokyo proper, working adults owning a car is the default
Same in Osaka and Nagoya — working adults owning a car is the default there too
One way or another, it's a car-dependent society everywhere, so it's essential
72AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:25
The number of times you think "eh, let's just go check it out" really shoots up
And once that piles up, it adds up to a surprising amount of knowledge
74AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:26
Re: #72
Isn't that more about how urban an area you live in than whether you have a car?
85AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:32
Going on about how just having a car changes your range of movement
really has a "country bumpkin" vibe to it
Well, I guess in the countryside you can't go anywhere without one
87AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:34
Re: #85
In the countryside a car is mandatory, so people there never even stop to think about the range-of-movement pros and cons of owning one in the first place
88AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:34
Re: #85
Even in the city, most of it is basically suburbs
It's true that a car changes your range of movement there too
97AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:47
Re: #94 If you already get that point, why did you go and post something like Re: #85?
94AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:46
I get that "having a car is more convenient!" but
jumping from there to "so not having a car means you're poor!" is way too extreme a take
Because by that logic, if you actually had money you'd hire a driver
which would make anyone who drives their own car just as "poor"
99AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:49
Re: #94
Look… the whole "a car is convenient to have" framing is itself a carless person's way of thinking
Seriously, outside central Tokyo, owning a car is just the default
In Osaka, being carless is only excusable if you're a college student living alone
106AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:53
I mean, cities developed specifically so you wouldn't need a car
There's no need to deliberately go against that and drive anyway
It's like using an expensive machine to climb the stairs in an apartment building that already has an elevator
109AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:54
Re: #106
Sure, as long as you never leave the city center
111AnonymousSep 10, 2026 19:59
Re: #106
You see this opinion a fair amount on Nan-G (this board's regular nickname), but
there's data showing that even among city dwellers, the higher their income, the higher the car ownership rate
So "the city is developed enough that you don't need a car" doesn't really hold up
125AnonymousSep 10, 2026 20:10
Re: #106
You're just someone who walks everywhere, aren't you

Background and Key Points of the Discussion

Car ownership rates are higher in rural areas than in cities, so the two sides of this debate start from fundamentally different premises: people in city centers with well-developed public transit who “don’t feel inconvenienced without a car,” versus people whose daily living sphere simply isn’t reached by public transit at all. The thread’s disagreement also never resolved, since some see the expansion of one’s range of movement as an effect of owning a car, while others see it purely as a matter of population density where you live.

As one reply pointed out, higher-income groups do tend to have higher car-ownership rates, and it’s actually been observed that even in urban areas, people are more likely to own a car as their income rises. It’s worth keeping in mind that the simple “city = no car needed” dichotomy tends to ignore factors like disposable income and family situation.

Claims like “owning a car makes you popular with women” or “no car means a narrow range of movement” don’t go beyond personal anecdotes, and no verifiable data was presented in the thread either. It’s entertaining as a read, but shouldn’t be taken as a generalizable conclusion.

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread “Buying a Car Changed My Life.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *