France’s Proposed Net Tax of 5.5 Cents Per GB Draws Skepticism Abroad

From our other sites

The story

The French government is reportedly considering a new tax on internet data traffic, sparking discussion on the German-language forum Lemmy c/dach. Under the proposal, a tax of 5.5 cents would be levied for every gigabyte downloaded. The thread drew particular attention to the fact that VideoLAN, the non-profit behind the free video player VLC, has already pushed back hard against the plan, as well as concrete calculations of just how much tax downloading a huge game would rack up — fueling a broader debate over the fairness of the tax and comparisons with electricity costs.

French government considering internet tax: 5.5 cents per gigabyte

Source: heise.de / Original article here

What people said

2Anonymous2026-11-01 10:15
To give a concrete example: GTA6 is coming out soon, and its download size has been announced as 210GB. At this tax rate, that alone works out to €11.55 in download tax. Streaming 4K video uses about 7GB per hour, so that's 38.5 cents in tax. This is completely insane.
13Anonymous2026-11-01 10:40
Re: #2
€12 is about what I'd be willing to pay for the game itself. That shouldn't be the price of a single download. And on top of that there's the electricity cost too (about €0.30 for a 200W PC running 5 hours at 100Mbps).

I'm not that big a GTA fan myself, but this issue really has nothing to do with the game's content.
3Anonymous2026-11-01 09:56
>This new tax looks set to hit companies that are already fighting back hard against it. VideoLAN is one of its fiercest critics. This non-profit develops the famous free video player VLC, the widely-used video codec x264, and a bunch of other codec and library projects.

Do they really want to go after outfits like that?
4Anonymous2026-11-01 09:26
Kind of reminds me of the feudal era, when nonsensical taxes were popping up everywhere in the Middle Ages.
6Anonymous2026-11-01 09:51
Re: #4
People love to blame the Middle Ages for stuff like this, same as with witch trials, but that was actually an early modern thing ([beard tax](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartsteuer)).
5Anonymous2026-11-01 09:49
If they limited this to just the big American media companies, I'd honestly be fine with it.
7Anonymous2026-11-01 10:14
But doesn't that mean it'd be cheaper outside peak hours, and sites would basically end up with 'business hours'?
10Anonymous2026-11-01 10:30
Re: #7
If there's oversupply, I want to get paid for what I downloaded.
12Anonymous2026-11-01 10:52
Re: #7
I can already picture it: you try to check Lemmy real quick, it won't load, and all you get is a 'back in 5 minutes' sign instead. 😐
8Anonymous2026-11-01 10:29
Guess memes are going to have to be text-only from now on to save bytes.
9Anonymous2026-11-01 10:00
At first I thought this was from Postillon (a German satire news site). Can't we test this out on some small country first and use it as a cautionary tale?
14Anonymous2026-11-01 10:45
Re: #13
Let's hope your PC doesn't actually draw 200W just for downloading.
15Anonymous2026-11-01 10:47
Re: #14
Maybe that's a bit of an overestimate. Electricity costs are pretty small compared to the tax anyway.

Background and key points of this discussion

France’s proposal aims to secure new tax revenue by charging based on data volume, but it has sparked backlash because the tax could hit not just major video streaming services but also non-commercial, open-source software like VideoLAN, the non-profit behind VLC. The thread raised plenty of practical points — whether drawing the line at download volume makes sense, comparisons with existing costs like electricity, and whether pricing should vary by peak hours — but what stood out most was the interest in concrete calculations of just how much extra tax would get tacked onto downloading large games.

*This article is a translated excerpt from the thread “Frankreich plant Internetsteuer: 5,5 Cent pro Gigabyte” on the overseas forum Lemmy c/dach, translated and edited by our team. Our site takes responsibility for the translation.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *