From our other sites
The story
NPB has settled on a plan to overhaul its “player compensation” system for free-agent transfers starting in the 2027 off-season, replacing the current rule — handing over one player — with a choice between transferring a draft pick or settling in cash. According to the Hochi Shimbun, the baseline would be a 2nd-round draft pick for an A-rank player and a 3rd-round pick for a B-rank player, with players 35 and older remaining exempt from compensation as before. On 5ch’s “Nandemo Jikkyo G” board, opinions split three ways: some argued that if cash settlements catch on, deep-pocketed teams will find it even easier to stock up on star players; others countered that since late-round picks have increasingly turned into core players in recent years, giving up a draft pick would actually hurt more; and still others suggested the new system could end up favoring weaker teams instead.
What people said
October 30, 2026, 15:25
So if you've got the money, there's zero downside — just take whoever you want?
Whether they pick cash or a draft pick is up to the other side, isn't it?
So this year's the last one with player compensation?
If it's something like ¥500 million (~$3.3M), they'll lean toward the draft pick instead.
The choice belongs to the player's former team.
Isn't it the team losing the player that chooses?
Yeah, I think so too.
Unless cash becomes the main option, teams will only go after elite A-rankers.
This is so stingy.
Well, if it's a 1st-rounder for A and a 2nd-rounder for B, FA moves become too hard to pull off, but if the compensation is only a 3rd- or 4th-round pick, that's too cheap a trade-off.
Even SoftBank doesn't poach an A-rank player every single year though.
A player who slipped through SoftBank's protection list seems like a better bet than some random 2nd-round pick anyway.
These days even non-1st-rounders often turn into core players, so the damage would be huge.
Teams are basically built around their 2nd/3rd-round picks, so this would weaken them.
They're just patching whatever hole they've got.
A draft pick is only as good as your scouts' eye for talent, so it doesn't seem like much of a benefit.
Do you have any idea how late a B-rank team's 3rd-round pick actually comes?
All they'd have to do is scrap the pick-order reversal (the "snake" format where draft order flips each round).
"It's his fault we don't get a 2nd-round pick this year!"
…fans are gonna rip him apart for it.
Having the cost get judged only after the results are in is kind of brutal, now that you mention it.
A-rank → transfer a 2nd-round pick
B-rank → transfer a 3rd-round pick
Cash settlement is also an option
Players 35+: no compensation
You're also missing that the B-rank range shrinks while the C-rank range expands to make up for it.
One of them's probably cash, right?
That's because A-rankers just go to MLB instead.
If there's no secret pre-draft deal (an informal arrangement teams sometimes strike with a prospect) in place, they won't get to play around with Oda.
Not bad, if it means they still get two FA signings.
They just made it so you can't land two A-rankers anymore.
Now that you put it that way, this is starting to sound pretty bad.
The fact that the 3rd round starts from the top teams is kind of baffling too.
Bottom-tier teams lose more players to FA in the first place anyway.
There'll be more B-rank players too, so bottom-tier teams actually come out ahead.
Background and Key Points of Debate
Under NPB’s current free-agent compensation system, the team signing an A-rank player must hand over one player as compensation, with detailed exceptions such as no compensation required for players 35 and older. According to reporting by the Hochi Shimbun, the new system would make transferring a 2nd-round draft pick the baseline for an A-rank signing and a 3rd-round pick for a B-rank signing, while also letting teams settle with cash instead. What split opinion in the thread was who actually stands to benefit from this setup. One camp argued that if cash settlements become the norm, financially strong teams will find it easier to land star players risk-free; the other argued that transferring draft picks would actually favor weaker teams (this is rooted in the fact that the revision also widens the range of players classified as B-rank, and that from the 3rd round onward, picking order starts with the lowest-placed teams). It’s also worth noting, as seen in replies 19, 27, and 28, that commenters themselves disagreed over who holds the choice between a draft pick and cash — it’s actually the player’s original team that decides — a point of confusion readers may stumble over too.
*This article is compiled from excerpts and a summary of the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread, ‘NPB to Change FA Compensation’.
Leave a Reply