Domestic AI Firm ‘Noetra’ Gets ¥1 Trillion Backing — 5ch: ‘Even ¥10 Trillion Wouldn’t Be Enough’

From our other sites

The story

Noetra, a domestic AI company backed by 44 Japanese firms including SoftBank, NEC, Sony, and Honda, with roughly ¥1 trillion in support from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), has President Hirotora Tamba voicing alarm: “If we fail, there’s no coming back.”

On 5ch, commenters pointed out that the key researchers behind GPT and NVIDIA were largely immigrants, joked cynically that METI’s involvement alone spells doom, and voiced pessimism that “even ¥10 trillion wouldn’t help — Japan just doesn’t have enough AI talent.”

Noetra, an artificial intelligence development company backed by 44 domestic firms including SoftBank, NEC, Sony Group, and Honda, with roughly ¥1 trillion in total support from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and others. It is the core company tasked with developing a domestic foundation model to serve as the “brain” for AI operating in the real world — so-called “physical AI” — including self-driving cars and robots. “This is our last chance. If we fail once, there’s no second try.” So declares Hirotora Tamba, who has taken the post of president and representative director. On why it must be homegrown…

Source: nikkei.com / Read the original article

What people said

2AnonymousAug 22, 2026 04:04
Is there even an organization or person here with the brains to build that brain? I keep seeing American companies pour tens of trillions of yen into this while they're already miles ahead — and we think this is gonna be fine?
3AnonymousAug 22, 2026 04:17
The world's gone this globalized and individualistic — there's no way poor Japan can come from behind in a field where it's already fallen behind.
Companies dumped their employees, so patriotism and company loyalty are dead, and all the talented people are fleeing overseas.
Japan and Japanese companies are left with nothing but useless salary thieves like me lol
5AnonymousAug 22, 2026 04:49
That kind of resolve deserves respect — though I'd feel a lot safer if he just stayed off airplanes.
7AnonymousAug 22, 2026 04:57
By the way, even just within OpenAI, a lot of the key developers are Polish — and not even American-educated, they're University of Warsaw grads.
8AnonymousAug 22, 2026 05:04
Ilya Sutskever, who built the first GPT —
born in Russia, raised in Israel.
Studied at the University of Toronto under Nobel physics laureate Geoffrey Hinton.
Went to Google together with Geoffrey.
The one who recruited them to Google —
Fei-Fei Li, raised in rural China.
Princeton, neuroscience.
Founded Stanford's Human-Centered AI Lab.
Li went to Google Cloud.
Geoffrey and the others went to Google Brain.
Geoffrey's British too, by the way.
Besides Ilya there's another one, Alex —
Alex is the pioneer who brought AI to PCs using NVIDIA GPUs.
NVIDIA owes where it is today to these three.
None of them are American.

Elon Musk —
South Africa.

Peter Thiel, the godfather of the PayPal Mafia and big boss at Palantir —
born in Germany, raised in South Africa.

Where exactly are the Americans in all this?
48AnonymousAug 22, 2026 16:12
Re: #8
Ugh, purists are exhausting.
9AnonymousAug 22, 2026 05:18
I started wondering if universities that don't select students based on math even have a reason to exist, back when I was prepping for entrance exams — and now the gap with the rest of the world can't be hidden anymore.
10AnonymousAug 22, 2026 06:18
No way Japan can pull this off —
we can't even produce originality.
11AnonymousAug 22, 2026 07:21
Well, it's just a system for skimming off tax money, so nobody really cares if it succeeds or fails.
Nobody takes responsibility anyway.
13AnonymousAug 22, 2026 08:30
The endgame of the bureaucrat's board game is landing a cushy "amakudari" post-retirement post (bureaucrats parachuting into cushy jobs) — 10 days of work a year for tens of millions of yen, collecting a retirement bonus, then rinse and repeat. Unless that whole system changes, of course the country's going to fall apart.
14AnonymousAug 22, 2026 08:49
"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and others" —

The moment I saw that, I knew this was doomed.
With METI, the ultimate jinx, attached to it, it's completely over.
15AnonymousAug 22, 2026 08:56
A company with so many captains it might just sail straight into outer space. (riff on the proverb "too many captains steer the ship up a mountain")
16AnonymousAug 22, 2026 09:02
Honestly, the right move is probably to use Japanese money to just buy up a few American startups.
35AnonymousAug 22, 2026 10:50
Unless they let people use it freely during development and harvest the data from that, this isn't going to work.
36AnonymousAug 22, 2026 11:31
Pretty sure we're about 120 laps behind at this point…
37AnonymousAug 22, 2026 11:50
They could probably distill their way to the same level pretty quickly, right? (referring to AI "distillation," copying a rival model's know-how into a cheaper one)
39AnonymousAug 22, 2026 12:50
No, the question is why they didn't start this sooner.
40AnonymousAug 22, 2026 13:03
Japan can't do this, might as well give up already.
41AnonymousAug 22, 2026 13:18
Lots of shills in here too.
The moment the investment dries up, it's over.
44AnonymousAug 22, 2026 13:38
Re: #41
If it were the latest version I'd be all for it, but what's the point of funding something that's already behind? Just another vested-interest racket.
42AnonymousAug 22, 2026 13:35
Not totally sure, but isn't this already behind the times at this point?
I'd get it if they threw a huge budget at something on par with the latest US/China AI, but
funding something that's already behind — isn't that just wasting tax money?
43AnonymousAug 22, 2026 13:37
Not totally sure, but isn't this already behind the times at this point?
I'd get it if they poured a huge budget into something on par with the latest US/China AI, but
throwing a huge budget at a version that's already behind — isn't that just wasting tax money?
Develop the latest model first, then go all in at once.
45AnonymousAug 22, 2026 14:01
Can't they just take a page from China's book — rip off everything and ignore human rights while they're at it?
46AnonymousAug 22, 2026 14:08
Even in the world of car restoration and customization, the US is already on another level with 3D scanning and CNC machining.
47AnonymousAug 22, 2026 15:25
It's probably because the incompetent always say "AI's so amazing I don't need to try anymore." Corporate recruiters should really sharpen their skills at spotting the incompetent people who've just been leaning on AI a little.
50AnonymousAug 22, 2026 17:27
Even a useless AI company like Tier IV wins the moment it goes public. (Tier IV: a Japanese self-driving startup)
51AnonymousAug 22, 2026 17:35
By the time this thing's finished, all I can picture is a future where we're still laps behind.
52AnonymousAug 22, 2026 17:51
Don't get so dramatic over a mere ¥1 trillion.
Building just one frontier LLM probably costs about that much anyway.
And plenty of projects burn that much money and still flop — that's just normal.
53AnonymousAug 22, 2026 17:58
If they're seriously aiming for the next frontier, ¥1 trillion isn't nearly enough.
54AnonymousAug 22, 2026 18:15
These guys can't even build an original LLM, and now they're going for physical AI… pfft.
55AnonymousAug 22, 2026 18:43
Even ¥10 trillion wouldn't be enough.
There just aren't enough people who can actually develop AI.
Same reason Toyota's behind on self-driving despite having plenty of money.
56AnonymousAug 22, 2026 19:04
It comes down to the gap in ultra-wealthy backers.
In the end,

of course it's going to fail — this is a one-shot bet that's not allowed to fail.

The strength of the US
is capital that can prop up perpetually money-losing startups,
and the ultra-rich who make that possible.

Even if OpenAI or Anthropic fail, there are endless replacements waiting.
That's depth of bench.

Corporate slaves, bureaucrats, bank employees — none of them can pull this off.
They start infighting immediately,
too busy dodging responsibility and blaming everyone else.
60AnonymousAug 22, 2026 23:44
Re: #56
That "ultra-rich who make that possible" —
that's money from wealthy people worldwide,
not just American money.
That's exactly its biggest strength, and
it's not remotely for the benefit of the American public.

Meanwhile, Japan's tax money and policy aren't for the benefit of its citizens either.

Sorry to the guy in Re: #1, but on the macro level,
this is nothing more than a sacrificial offering so politicians and bureaucrats can look like they're doing something.
66AnonymousAug 23, 2026 14:08
Japan was actually ahead in AI frameworks and ASICs, you know.
A Japanese AI company —
Preferred Networks.

Then got overtaken and left in the dust by latecomers.

They had foresight.
They had vision.
So why?

Background and Key Points

Noetra sits inside a specific Japanese institutional pattern: METI (経済産業省), the industrial-policy ministry, assembling a keiretsu-style consortium of 44 firms — SoftBank, NEC, Sony, Honda among them — to build a “national champion” in a strategic technology, much as it has done before with semiconductors and displays. ¥1 trillion (roughly $6.7 billion) is a genuinely large sum by Japanese startup standards, but the thread’s own numbers put it in perspective: a single frontier US model can cost that much to train, and US hyperscalers spend multiples of it per quarter. Noetra’s stated target isn’t a ChatGPT rival — it’s “physical AI,” the foundation models meant to run self-driving cars and robots, a domain where Japan still has manufacturing and hardware strength even after ceding ground in general-purpose LLMs.

The thread doesn’t really split on whether Japan is behind — everyone agrees on that. It splits on why failure is treated as near-certain: one camp (post 8, 55) points to a structural talent shortage, arguing Japan’s exam system and corporate culture don’t produce or retain the kind of researchers who built GPT and NVIDIA’s software stack; another camp (52, 56) argues ¥1 trillion failing is just normal AI economics, and the real gap is access to patient mega-capital, not raw talent. Post 48’s one-line pushback against the “none of them are American” recitation is the only real friction in the thread, and it goes unanswered.

What’s absent is any mention of METI’s actual track record with these consortium bets — Elpida, Japan Display — which failed for reasons closer to governance and market timing than talent. Readers unfamiliar with amakudari (post 13) should note it’s a real, documented practice of retired bureaucrats taking paid board seats at firms their ministry funded, not just cynical shorthand.

*This article is compiled from excerpts and a summary of the 5ch (Business News+) thread [AI] Noetra President Tamba’s Anxiety over Domestic AI Development: “If We Fail, There’s No Coming Back”.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *