Apple announced new Mac mini and Mac Studio models, sparking discussion on 5ch’s Business News+ board. The new Mac mini starts at $899, while the top-end Mac Studio configuration runs $5,499, and debate broke out over memory capacity and pricing for running AI locally. Some commented, “You could buy a Hiace (Toyota’s popular commercial van) for what the Mac Studio costs,” and the thread expanded into comparisons with Windows.
(Bloomberg): Apple Inc. unveiled the latest models of its “Mac mini” and “Mac Studio” desktop computers on the 25th, significantly upgrading the processors in both high-demand machines.
The new Mac mini starts at $899 and comes equipped with Apple’s new “M6” chip or the “M5 Pro.” For the Mac Studio, the M5 Max configuration starts at $2,499, while the new M5 Ultra configuration runs $5,499.
According to Apple, both models are available for pre-order starting the 25th, with in-store sales beginning September 22. They will ship with the latest version of the Mac operating system, “macOS 27 Golden Gate,” pre-installed. The OS will begin rolling out to other Mac users this fall.
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
2AnonymousAug 26, 2026 19:57
I'd have bought one if it were still ¥100 to the dollar.
3AnonymousAug 26, 2026 20:04
For a while, a high-memory Mac Studio is a necessary evil.
If the Republicans somehow win the midterms, the world will probably start shifting away from US reliance, toward Medusa Halo + Linux Mint or OpenSUSE.
22AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:47
Re: #3
Calling one model choice a "necessary evil" — you don't understand the world at all.
Amazing you can write about things with such a narrow worldview.
4AnonymousAug 26, 2026 20:21
If I were buying, it'd be the Mac mini.
Not that I'm buying, lol
5AnonymousAug 26, 2026 20:32
Isn't this basically just a price hike?
6AnonymousAug 26, 2026 20:34
Mac mini | Dell (3x 32-inch monitors)
7AnonymousAug 26, 2026 20:42
The Mac mini got popular for running AI locally and became hard to find.
But if the new one is 4x faster at AI, guess it's fine I never got my hands on the old model.
8AnonymousAug 26, 2026 21:19
32GB is the wall for running local models with around 10 billion (10B) parameters.
If you're aiming for 100B, you need 128GB.
11AnonymousAug 26, 2026 21:49
Re: #8
DDR5-44800 64GB x2 runs about ¥300,000, you know?
14AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:15
Re: #8
It's unified memory, but the mini tops out at 64GB while the Studio goes up to 512GB, so it should work fine either way?
Configure the Studio with 128GB RAM and a 1TB SSD and it ends up costing about the same as an NVIDIA DGX Spark.
9AnonymousAug 26, 2026 21:28
The new Mac mini is basically an AI machine.
10AnonymousAug 26, 2026 21:45
I tried to buy a Mac mini back in July, but the lead time was so absurdly long it killed my motivation and I just let it drop.
My old Catalina-era iMac still works fine for most things, but it's no good for AI.
12AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:12
Honestly, at this point secondhand is fine.
13AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:15
I'm on an M2, and AI models do run — but they still eat up way too many resources.
At this rate it's not even going to fit on a phone. Not good enough yet.
15AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:34
Is it really worth paying through the nose for these high specs and tokens?
16AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:42
I'll wait for the M7.
17AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:45
Looked it up — the original Mac mini (2005): $499, ¥58,590 including tax.
24AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:54
Re: #17
Totally different thing — that's comparing to an Intel-era model. The original was a PowerPC, ancient history now.
Then it went Intel.
Then M1.
Completely different machines each time.
18AnonymousAug 26, 2026 22:57
1.2TB/s — that's RTX 5080-class memory bandwidth. They really splurged on this one.
19AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:11
Why not just run AI in the cloud?
25AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:59
Re: #19
That's true for most people.
But if you want an AI agent actually doing work for you,
running it yourself keeps costs down.
If you don't get that, you don't need this at all.
Claude Code
OpenAI Codex
Peter Schneider, who made "Clawd Code," has joined OpenAI and says he's building something even moms can use, so before long
something that does this remotely — and cheaper, regardless of the big names — should show up.
Enjoy the wait until then.
If it's not for work, this is otaku-level hobby stuff.
20AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:30
Which is better — this, or a Windows machine with a beefy GPU crammed in?
23AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:48
Re: #20
Depends on what you actually want to do with it.
If you don't even know that, you don't need either one.
21AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:32
From what I've experienced, with Apple you get performance that matches what you paid.
Windows, on the other hand…
26AnonymousAug 26, 2026 23:59
I put Linux (Ubuntu) on my mother Masako's old iMac.
She doesn't seem to have any complaints.
They claim 20% of Americans use Linux — yeah, sure.
Meanwhile in the People's Republic of China there are orders to use Linux.
What's that about?
It's been hot this year, so I figured whatever runs power-efficiently is fine — that's how I ended up here.
28AnonymousAug 27, 2026 00:20
> The M6 Mac mini comes with 16GB of memory, with up to 32GB available as an option.
Given the power of this thing and the workloads it's meant to handle, I still can't wrap my head around that amount of memory being enough.
29AnonymousAug 27, 2026 00:39
Mac Studio costs as much as a Hiace van, lmao
30AnonymousAug 27, 2026 05:38
Local LLMs aside, once Apple Intelligence really kicks in it's apparently going to eat up a ton of memory, so max out the RAM as much as your budget allows. Go with a half-measure amount of memory and you'll want to upgrade again in no time.
31AnonymousAug 27, 2026 05:50
You don't have to force yourself to use Ollama — just run the "apfel-chat" command and you get a similar setup.
33AnonymousAug 27, 2026 11:12
Buy a Mac, and if you've already got Windows you'll just stop using it anyway.
It'll end up as an expensive paperweight.
An iPhone, sure, if it's cheap, go ahead and buy one.
36AnonymousAug 27, 2026 12:31
Re: #33
Exactly right.
Switching over ends up cheaper in total cost.
34AnonymousAug 27, 2026 12:06
The argument is that paying for cloud ends up cheaper.
37AnonymousAug 27, 2026 12:35
Use case? Anything a Mac can do, Windows can do too.
Software assets? That's rich coming from Mac, which has abandoned its own software every time it switched architectures.
With Windows, apps from 20 years ago still run, and you've got virtualization too.
38AnonymousAug 27, 2026 12:40
Re: #37
Mac's CPU architecture has changed three times, after all.
Meanwhile some Windows 95-era software still runs on Windows — actually, Windows's backward compatibility is just absurd.
40AnonymousAug 27, 2026 12:52
Re: #37
If they can both do the same thing, just buy whichever one you like, no?
*This article is compiled from excerpts and a summary of the 5ch (Business News+) thread “[PC] Apple Refreshes Mac Mini and Mac Studio.”