Is “Higher Wages” the Key to Fixing Japan’s Low Birth Rate? 5ch Split Over Whether “It’s Mostly About Money”

From our other sites

The story

Job Research Institute, a research body run by Persol Career (the company behind the job-change service “doda”), has published survey results naming “rising wages” as the policy most needed to combat Japan’s declining birth rate. On 5ch, this struck a chord with users pointing to soaring education and child-rearing costs, but plenty pushed back too — “wages were low in the Meiji era too, and yet people had lots of kids,” “it’s not about money, it’s about having too many other options” — leaving opinion split.

Job Research Institute, a research body operated by Persol Career Co., which also runs the job-change service “doda,” conducted a “2026 Survey on Awareness of the Declining Birthrate” targeting 450 working men and women.

The survey sheds light on working people’s attitudes toward the declining birth rate, covering the gap between the ideal and actual number of children, the factors standing in the way, how personally responsible people feel about the issue, and what policies they think are needed to improve it.

・Ideal vs. actual number of children

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

2AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:45
So how do we actually grow Japan's population?
What do we need to do to stop the birth rate from falling?
Instead of just criticizing everything, come up with some ideas.
Why does everyone only complain?
21AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:47
Re: #2
Crack down on real estate speculation.
Housing's become a plaything for capitalists, so it's just way too expensive.
Foreigners shouldn't be allowed to buy and sell it however they please.
22AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:48
Re: #2
Make childbirth and childcare a state duty (paid public service) and numbers will go up.
35AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:49
Re: #2
Abolish compulsory education. Education costs way too much.
8AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:46
Nope, that's not it.
Even back in the low-wage Meiji era, the number of kids kept rising.
102AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:55
Re: #8
Do you not get that the cost of raising kids is completely different now than it was back then?
These days there's this pervasive attitude that if you can't give your kid all sorts of experiences and put them through university, the poor kid is being shortchanged.
Also, back then kids were labor, but nowadays a kid brings absolutely nothing to the household.
In other words, in today's world a child is just a liability.
20AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:47
So why do poor countries in Africa and other developing nations have so many kids?
26AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:48
Re: #20
Because kids can be used as labor.
60AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:52
Re: #20
In developing countries the main industry is primary-sector work close to home, so the whole family can pitch in as labor.
In developed countries full of salaried workers, you can't put kids to work, so a child is just a luxury item with no practical payoff.
23AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:48
Getting more women to be full-time housewives is the best fix, honestly.
33AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:49
Re: #23
No point pushing more full-time housewives.
Watching three kids alone is brutal.
It's easier — and brings in money — to drop them at daycare and go to work.
50AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:51
Re: #33
Money isn't even the important thing here.
38AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:50
Only option left is to amend the constitution and make marriage mandatory.
45AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:50
Quit only bringing up civil servants.
51AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:51
Re: #45
Wait, is it actually going up for civil servants?
We'd need an actual survey on whether the birth rate is higher among civil servants.
82AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:54
Re: #51
Civil servants already have an insanely high birth rate to begin with.
62AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:52
Serious answer: raise wages for high-school-educated blue-collar workers
and lower wages (and status) for college-educated white-collar workers — flip the social hierarchy.
72AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:53
Re: #62
If that's what it takes, I'd rather just keep the birth rate falling.
79AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:54
Re: #62
Blue-collar jobs can just be replaced with immigrant labor.
83AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:54
Re: #62
Do you realize how dumb that sounds?
66AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:53
Re: #50
And with no money, then what?
Just mass-produce more high-school grads raised poor?
71AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:53
Getting more women to be full-time housewives is the best fix, honestly.
Re: #66
Sending them off to daycare is the sadder option, if anything.
78AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:53
I don't think it's simply a money problem.
109AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:56
Re: #78
It's mostly money.

The families who manage to have three kids are doctors, civil servants, or big-corporation households.
130AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:58
So why is the birth rate higher in low-wage regions?
138AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:58
Re: #130
In areas where young women move away, the denominator shrinks, so the birth rate looks higher.
146AnonymousAug 27, 2026 16:59
Re: #130
Because the cause isn't money — it's having too many other options.
156AnonymousAug 27, 2026 17:00
Re: #130
In the countryside people often inherit land and a house from their parents, so even without money there's a decent amount of breathing room.
162AnonymousAug 27, 2026 17:00
Supporting families after they've already had kids is pointless.
Just design the system so having kids actually pays off.
183AnonymousAug 27, 2026 17:02
Re: #162
One-time support just at birth doesn't work.
It weakens the sense of responsibility for raising the kid.
They need to hand out a massive child allowance instead.
184AnonymousAug 27, 2026 17:02
Re: #162
We're a democracy, so doing that would lose you the election — parents with kids are a tiny minority.

*This article is compiled and summarized from the 5ch (Newsplus) thread “‘Rising Wages’ Needed to Fix Japan’s Declining Birth Rate, Job Research Institute Finds”.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *