Financial Income to Factor Into Medical Costs for Over-75s — 5ch: “Totally Support Taking From Rich Old People”

From our other sites

The story

Nikkei reports that Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has settled on a policy to factor financial income — such as stock dividends and capital gains — into the calculation of out-of-pocket medical costs and insurance premiums under the late-stage elderly healthcare system, which covers people aged 75 and over. Implementation is planned for August 2029, and the change is expected to target elderly people holding a certain level of financial assets. In the 5ch Breaking News+ thread, opinions that it’s only fair to take more from wealthy seniors mixed with worries about the impact on NISA tax-free savings accounts and on the “lost generation,” and debate continued over how income would be tracked and the distinction between social insurance premiums and taxes.

Medical costs for over-75s to factor in financial income starting August 2029 — Health Ministry policy – Nikkei

October 14, 2026, 21:19

[Subscriber-only article]

Source: nikkei.com / Read the original article here

What people said

10AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:34
Me, a single middle-aged guy
I won't live that long anyway
11AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:35
Re: #10
Same here
Let's just take it easy
26AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:40
Re: #10
The guys who keep saying 'I'm gonna die soon' are always the ones who end up living the longest
That's just how it goes
74AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:52
Re: #10
I bet I'll die before I even start collecting my pension
16AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:37
Not sure how much in financial assets would actually be the cutoff, but it'll probably keep creeping lower over time. If elderly healthcare keeps getting worse, the working-age generation supporting them ends up with a heavier load too, and everyone goes under together.
102AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:58
Re: #16
Abenomics sent the Nikkei average up 6x. They've got no choice but to take it from the baby boomers who dumped their retirement payouts into stocks and made a fortune lol
17AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:37
If you earn a lot, Japan's government punishes you by confiscating it

But if you're an idle NEET doing nothing, there's nothing to take — so they protect you with money seized from people who actually earned it

Imperial Japan isn't full-blown socialism like that 'Buzzcut Nation' (slang for North Korea, mocking Kim Jong-un's haircut) — it's more like sneaky, under-the-table socialism
22AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:38
Re: #17
It's from age 75, right?
You've already got one foot in the coffin by then, so having money doesn't do you much good anyway.
78AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:53
Re: #17
Earning a ton means nothing once you're dead lol
Stop counting on your parents' money and compete on your own ability and talent instead

Let's make Japan a meritocracy instead of a socialist state lol
19AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:37
What about inheritance tax? Let's stop relying on our parents' money.
144AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:12
Re: #19
Inheritance tax should logically be cut in half
Didn't your old man leave you anything?
34AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:43
The pension age is moving to 65, medical costs are rising, there's long-term care insurance to pay, and even though I'm doing a little bit of NISA investing, are they gonna take from that too?
Well, it's probably aimed at the wealthy
Just let us ants (the hardworking savers, like in the Ant and the Grasshopper fable) enjoy a comfortable retirement too
57AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:49
Re: #34
If it's NISA savings investing, it's tax-free, so that shouldn't be a problem
40AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:46
People in their 50s are the biggest demographic group in Japan right now
Better take countermeasures before this wave hits
50AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:47
Re: #40
The lost generation already got screwed over by failed government policy
and now they're going to get squeezed all the way into old age too?
52AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:48
Re: #40
People in their 40s and 50s will be the ones hitting old age next before they know it, so you'd better think carefully now about who you vote for, for your own future's sake
42AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:46
But rich people already pay a ton in taxes
Why do the deadbeats who don't pay taxes get the favorable treatment?
69AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:52
Re: #42
They're already paying huge amounts in tax, so if anything
their out-of-pocket costs should be lowered instead
86AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:55
Re: #42
Honestly, it is kind of unfair lol
49AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:47
Is it just the out-of-pocket costs?
Shouldn't the premiums reflect it too?
71AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:52
Re: #49
Premiums will reflect it too. It's right there in the article.
58AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:49
How are they even planning to track this?

Can they really build a system that automatically catches people who don't even file tax returns?
82AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:54
Re: #58
It's financial income, so that means things like dividends and gains from selling stocks.
That all gets tracked through the brokerage anyway.
60AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:49
Re: #57
Social insurance premiums are not taxes.
75AnonymousOct 14, 2026 21:53
Re: #60
This is about
> stock dividends and capital gains
right?
In that case, NISA savings investment gains don't count as taxable income, so it's not an issue
143AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:12
Totally in favor of taking it from rich old people
Should've done this sooner
148AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:14
Re: #143
A 100% consumption tax on eating out is actually a good idea
151AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:15
Re: #143
They should just take it from old folks cruising around in Mercedes-Benzes
175AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:22
What are the lost-generation guys supposed to do about this?
186AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:25
Re: #175
Lost-generation folks are going to get their welfare cut even further,
so it's basically decided they'll work until their bodies give out
188AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:26
Re: #186
The lost-generation guys are basically treated as second-class citizens at this point
189AnonymousOct 14, 2026 22:26
Re: #186
Even the generations below the lost generation are in trouble too

Background and Key Points of This Topic

Under the current late-stage elderly healthcare system, out-of-pocket costs and insurance premiums are calculated mainly based on income such as pensions and wages, and financial income — like stock dividends and capital gains (excluding tax-free amounts from NISA and similar schemes) — is, in principle, not factored in. This new policy would track that financial income through securities account data and other sources and add it to the cost calculation, with the change expected to apply only to elderly people holding assets above a certain threshold. In the thread, the majority view was that wealthy seniors should be asked to shoulder a fair share, while members of the working-age “lost generation” voiced anxiety about the burden on them growing even heavier down the road. There were also posts that seemed to misunderstand how the system works — for instance, that social insurance premiums are legally treated separately from taxes, and that NISA investment gains don’t count as taxable income. Implementation is slated for August 2029, but details such as the exact asset threshold weren’t disclosed even in the original article (subscriber-only).

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Breaking News+) thread “Medical costs for over-75s to factor in financial income starting August 2029 — Health Ministry policy.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *