M!LK’s Yamanaka Juutaro-Produced Ring Accused of Copying Another Brand, Sparks Backlash — 5ch: ‘Basically a Frank Muller vs. Frank Miura Situation’

From our other sites

The story

A ring design produced by M!LK’s Juutaro Yamanaka has come under fire on social media for allegedly resembling a product from an established jewelry brand, sparking discussion on 5ch’s Hello! Project board. Commenters were split on how seriously to take the resemblance, with one popular comparison likening it to “Frank Muller and Frank Miura” — a reference to a famous Japanese parody watch brand whose name and look mimic Frank Muller’s but which was ruled legally distinct. Some defended the ring on the grounds that it costs roughly 1/50th of the original, while others noted the backlash was worse precisely because Yamanaka himself is known to love high-end jewelry brands.

What people said

2AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:14
M!LK's songs are rip-offs too, through and through
7AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:17
Isn't that just Iconiq?
14AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:17
Same materials too?
15AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:18
"Produced by" lol
18AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:19
The only one I can still trust is Sano Hiroto
19AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:19
The whole agency needs to bow their heads over this
20AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:19
Yeah, honestly, this one's just too similar
23AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:20
Guess anything's forgiven as long as it's selling well
24AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:20
Kind of like the Frank Muller vs. Frank Miura situation (Frank Miura: a famous parody watch brand that won a trademark suit by being "different enough" from the real Frank Muller)
26AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:24
M!LK wota (hardcore fans) were that furious about the 'Real Piece' thing, so of course they're gonna criticize this too
29AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:28
I mean, stuff like this happens all the time lololol
30AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:29
It's obviously a fake, so it's totally fine lol lol
35AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:34
This level of similarity seems pretty common, honestly
36AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:35
Probably just some ghostwriter-type designer who ripped it off
39AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:54
Feels like M!LK is treated as public enemy number one by the old Johnny's agency
40AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:54
Classic case of staff pitching a few options and him saying "okay" without knowing about the original brand?
42AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:56
Can we somehow pin this on Johnny's too?
43AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:59
Momoiro Clover Z used to be THE name for rip-off scandals, but I guess they're really done as a topic now
44AnonymousOct 11, 2026 14:59
M!LK's songs are rip-offs too, so this is nothing new
45AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:01
The "who cares if it's a copy, the visuals are great" mentality
47AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:03
Johnny's fans were mad about stage production being copied, saying stuff like mine carts and flying rigs were things Johnny's started first
58AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:32
Re: #47
I heard Johnny Kitagawa was the first to bring flying rigs to Japan — supposedly Shonentai or someone was the guinea pig forced to try it onstage
48AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:04
If he says he didn't know, people will point out he's supposedly a high-end jewelry obsessive who knows this stuff inside and out. If he says staff came up with it, that means he didn't actually "produce" anything. So all he can do is stay quiet
49AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:07
It's 1/50th the price, so no problem
53AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:21
We've got our own Tanimoto situation too, so we're not really in a position to talk about others
54AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:22
Being credited as "producer" versus just doing a commercial or ad campaign — in practice there's barely any difference, is there
55AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:23
Hello! Project has the Nacchi incident too, so we can't exactly talk
59AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:33
Re: #55
There's also Mikitty's yakiniku incident, so we really can't talk
63AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:38
Maybe just don't take jobs that are basically lending out your name
64AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:38
At the very least he could've made the stone setting round instead, or gone with a single color
65AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:40
Say what you want, but the original brand's design is just more refined, as expected. The M!LK one does feel kind of sloppy, like a knockoff. Thinking about it that way, maybe it's within an acceptable range
68AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:43
This guy loves high-end jewelry, which is exactly why people are mad — like, so he's fine with fans wearing a fake?
70AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:44
Didn't know guys who are into jewelry actually existed
71AnonymousOct 11, 2026 15:44
Frank Miura was ruled not guilty because it was different enough!!

Background and Key Points of the Debate

The name “Frank Miura” keeps coming up because of a famous 2016 precedent: watchmaker Frank Muller sued the parody brand “Frank Miura” for trademark infringement, fought it all the way to Japan’s Supreme Court, and lost. That case established that a similar-looking product isn’t legally problematic as long as it’s “different enough that no one would mistake it for the real thing.” Drawing on that precedent, the thread saw parallel arguments: some defended the ring as falling within that same gray area, while others countered that costing 1/50th of the original doesn’t excuse reusing someone else’s design. The real point of contention is where to draw the line on calling mass-produced, fan-merchandise-style jewelry a “rip-off” — no legal conclusion has actually been reached here. The claim that Yamanaka favors high-end jewelry brands comes from posters in the thread, and whether the design similarity was intentional copying has not been confirmed, including any comment from his talent agency, as of this thread.

※This article is compiled and summarized from the 5ch (Hello! Project) thread “M!LK’s Juutaro Yamanaka Under Fire for Allegedly Copying Another Brand’s Design for His Produced Ring“.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *