South Korea to Relocate 44 Agencies, Including Foreign Ministry, to Sejong City — 5ch: ‘Japan Should Move Its Capital Too’

From our other sites

The story

On the 13th, the South Korean government announced it will gradually relocate 44 central government agencies, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense, from the capital Seoul to the central city of Sejong. The move is set to take place between 2027 and 2031, affecting roughly 10,000 civil servants. The Minister of the Interior and Safety explained the goal is to correct the excessive concentration of population and institutions in the greater Seoul area. On 5ch, users debated just how extreme Seoul’s over-concentration is, whether Sejong’s location makes sense given military tensions with North Korea, and whether Japan itself should finally do something about Tokyo’s own over-concentration.

South Korea to Relocate 44 Agencies, Including Foreign and Defense Ministries, to Sejong City — Easing Seoul’s Over-Concentration: Nikkei

Source: nikkei.com / Read the original article here

What people said

3AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:48
[Seoul — Erika Kobayashi] The South Korean government announced on the 13th that, as part of its plan to relocate central government agencies from the capital Seoul to the central city of Sejong, 44 agencies — including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense — will be covered. The move will happen in stages between 2027 and 2031, affecting an estimated 10,000 civil servants.

Interior and Safety Minister Yoon Ho-joong told a press conference, "This will overcome the over-concentration in the greater Seoul area and allow for balanced use of the country's land. It's a growth strategy that will lead to a new leap forward."
5AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:49
Japan should relocate its capital too, as a way to fix Tokyo's over-concentration
13AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:50
Re: #5
That's not happening — Japanese people are too stubborn and set in their ways for that
53AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:02
Re: #5
Real talk
So many problems would be solved by this alone
63AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:06
Re: #5
Say that and you get idiot local leaders swarming in shouting 'Osaka!' 'Fukuoka!' chasing their own vested interests
7AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:49
Meanwhile Japan's just fudging it with the 'secondary capital' idea
9AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:49
Indonesia isn't pulling it off either
10AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:50
They're finally doing it, using Japan as a cautionary tale
11AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:50
Well, obviously — it's insane to keep your capital within field-artillery range of the border with an enemy state you're technically still at war with, armistice or not
54AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:02
Re: #11
Seriously, how long is this armistice gonna last? Now that the North's gone nuclear, there's no way the war's restarting, so they should just officially end it and reconcile already
12AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:50
Well, Seoul is close to North Korea, so I guess that's why they're moving away…
lol, and yet it's getting closer
17AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:51
What would that be the equivalent of in Japan?
27AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:55
Re: #17
About like the distance from Tokyo to Hamamatsu
20AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:53
The capital can stay Tokyo, but I do think some degree of decentralization would be good
31AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:56
Re: #20
The Nankai Trough earthquake is basically guaranteed within 30 years — what's the case for sticking with Tokyo??
21AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:54
Neither Nusantara nor Naypyidaw is working out.
Don't hear much about Astana — wonder how that's going.
And who knows what'll happen with Karakorum.
22AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:54
Still, South Korea's really going for it — Seoul's become such a megacity that the rest of the country is even more depopulated than rural Japan
23AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:54
The moment I see the source is Nikkei, I get a little skeptical
55AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:02
Re: #23
True
Nikkei's a great paper on everything except economics
28AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:55
Everywhere outside Seoul in South Korea is turning into a ghost town of shuttered shops — are they really gonna be okay doing this?
34AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:56
Re: #28
Isn't that exactly why?
If the officials who can pull strings move there, companies will follow too. No idea what that does to the country's overall strength though
29AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:55
They've wanted to relocate for ages, but I'm pretty sure it's never gonna happen
32AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:56
Building a whole new political center basically from scratch must be tough
I think backing things up to Osaka and Fukuoka is the approach that actually fits Japan's current scale
33AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:56
Honestly, about half the government agencies have already moved to Sejong
43AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:59
Japan should relocate its capital too
Osaka would do just fine
47AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:00
Re: #43
Is Osaka even part of Japan?
46AnonymousOct 14, 2026 19:59
Wouldn't it honestly be more cost-effective to just build underground???
Set up a few thousand entrances and exits
And a few hundred thousand air vents???
They already know the missiles are coming anyway
The only one who'd even get mad about it is the US
75AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:12
Re: #46
Heavy rain flooding, geothermal heat, and residents' vitamin D deficiency are the real obstacles to an underground city — and especially now that the internet's advanced enough that you could build a society where people never need to leave underground, that sounds like it'd cause brutal health problems
60AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:04
Feels pretty dead center 🤔
64AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:07
Re: #60
I sense a strong will of 'anywhere but Jeolla Province, even if it kills us' (Jeolla being a region of South Korea)
82AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:16
South Korea's concentration in Seoul is on a totally different level than Tokyo — no comparison
86AnonymousOct 14, 2026 20:18
Re: #82
In Japan terms, that'd be like 60 million people crammed into Tokyo, Kanagawa, Chiba, and Saitama combined

Background and Key Points of the Debate

Sejong City has been undergoing phased functional relocation since 2012 as South Korea’s “administrative-centered multifunctional city,” and this latest move is an extension of that policy, with 44 agencies — including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense — and roughly 10,000 civil servants set to relocate between 2027 and 2031. While the thread title calls it a “capital relocation,” the presidential office and National Assembly will remain in Seoul, so strictly speaking this is a further decentralization of administrative functions rather than the capital itself moving wholesale. In the thread, opinions were divided: some argued that South Korea’s concentration in Seoul is more severe than Japan’s concentration in Tokyo, and that Japan should likewise disperse its functions given disaster risks such as the Nankai Trough earthquake, while others pushed back, pointing out that Japan already has a “secondary capital” plan underway for Osaka and Fukuoka, and that building an administrative city from scratch is inherently difficult.

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread “[Good News] South Korea Relocates Its Capital wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *