Big 4 Beer Makers Suspected of Price Cartel: Managers Allegedly Shared Pricing Sheets at Meetings

From our other sites

The story

The Fair Trade Commission has launched a mandatory investigation into suspected violations of the Antimonopoly Act by Japan’s four major beer makers over an alleged price cartel, sources say. At meetings where section-chief-level employees from each company discussed shipping prices, they are believed to have shared price lists broken down by product size. On 5channel, commenters split between those flatly calling it “an obvious case of collusion” and those who shrugged it off with “every industry does this.” Some also suggested the story is getting little coverage because the beer industry is a major TV advertising sponsor.

Thu, Oct 8, 8:53 AM JST

Kyodo News

In the price cartel case involving Japan’s four major beer makers — now under mandatory investigation by the Fair Trade Commission on suspicion of violating the Antimonopoly Act — sales representatives from each company are believed to have discussed shipping prices while sharing price lists at meetings, sources told reporters on the 8th. It also emerged that these meetings were mainly attended by section-chief-level employees, who appear to have coordinated prices by product size. The commission is working to clarify how decisions were made on the timing of price revisions and the size of price hikes by analyzing seized documents.

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

2AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:21
Wait, is this actually that bad?
65AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:43
Re: #2
This is about as bad as it gets
156AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:25
Re: #2
This is a textbook cartel if there ever was one
Honestly weird it wasn't a problem until now
Guess it felt like "safety in numbers, we're the almighty beer companies, look how much tax we pay"
But the media's biggest sponsor is beer, so this'll blow over fast
3AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:22
This isn't really funny, but since the beer industry is a huge sponsor of mass media, of course they won't cover it properly
Stations like TV Asahi usually make a huge fuss over stuff like this, but since it involves their parent company, they're just ignoring it
132AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:09
Re: #3
Yeah, they're all over the commercials
They've really got pull
But isn't this how every industry works?
It's basically the same handful of players everywhere
5AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:23
Ice cream makers were in the news for the same thing not that long ago
62AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:42
Re: #5
I mean
every industry does this
the Fair Trade Commission knows it too, and still goes after it
14AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:26
They said "we'll fully cooperate with the investigation" like butter wouldn't melt, but they clearly knew everything all along
21AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:28
Re: #14
>"We'll fully cooperate with the investigation"

That's exactly the kind of line a guilty party says
16AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:27
Guess we really do need foreign competitors to shake things up
90AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:53
Re: #16
Nothing changes until people start buying Chinese or Southeast Asian beer instead
17AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:27
Didn't realize section chiefs had the authority to run a cartel
That's the more surprising part to me
60AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:42
Re: #17
Just scapegoats thrown under the bus while the top brass walk free (lit. "cutting off the lizard's tail")
32AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:33
Cell carriers do the same thing, gas stations do the same thing, every industry does the same thing
35AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:34
Re: #32
Tell me exactly which phone plans are identical then
34AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:33
Antitrust violation aside, which beer makers are we even talking about here?
I don't drink, so I have no idea
40AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:35
Re: #34
Orion, the one from Okinawa
48AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:39
(door slides open) "Cocktail conspiracy?? Who the hell created this cartel?!" (a pun — "cartel suspicion" and "cocktail charm" sound alike in Japanese)
(door slides open) "I heard everything! Mankind is doomed!"
58AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:42
Re: #48
Boring. Your story was boring.
Yamada, take away all his cushions! (catchphrase from the comedy show Shōten, where a bad joke costs you your sitting cushion)
52AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:40
Re: #35
Wasn't it the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry that was furious at the three big carriers over something like this?
Though Rakuten got left out of that one lol
82AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:49
Re: #52
Wasn't that something other than the Antimonopoly Act? If they were actually charged under it, show me a source
87AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:52
Re: #82
Forget "prohibiting" monopolies — Japan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications is actively promoting them
129AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:08
Re: #87
Like I said, show me actual proof they colluded. No proof, no case — that's just a baseless accusation
96AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:54
Companies like Kotoku Shinryo, Shinmei, Itochu…
isn't the rice industry looking pretty shady lately too?
148AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:18
Re: #96
Turns out retailers were making the biggest profit off rice, so everyone shut up about that
100AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:55
Cartel or not, everyone's just buying Ichiban Shibori anyway (Kirin's top-selling beer brand)
107AnonymousOct 8, 2026 14:57
Re: #100
Harahettaa (a riff on "hara hetta" — "I'm hungry")
116AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:02
Train fares and car dealers probably have cartels too, don't they?
121AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:04
Re: #116
Instant ramen, ham, and gasoline are under suspicion too
125AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:06
They're doing whatever they want
Stores, please stock more imported beer and give consumers some actual choice
128AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:08
Re: #125
Funny thing is, the big retailers already tripped over their own feet pushing Korean private-label beer
Even rushing back to domestic brands now won't wash off the image that stuck
131AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:09
What's even the point of "freedom" when individuals aren't allowed to brew their own beer for fun in the first place…
146AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:18
Re: #131
Because it counts as tax evasion
Plus there've been a lot of fatal oxygen-deprivation accidents too
152AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:22
What's actually wrong with this? Isn't it just where competition ends up?
154AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:23
Re: #152
That's the thing — they stopped competing
157AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:25
Re: #152
It's the opposite lol
"Let's quit the price wars and the R&D arms race"
"People are drinking less and less, so let's stop wasting money on that stuff"
"Let's just get along" — that's not competing, that's colluding
159AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:25
Re: #152
If this is fine, then we don't even need the Fair Trade Commission anymore
200AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:51
The real problem is there are too few makers on store shelves to begin with
Every industry is effectively an oligopoly at this point

Making sure the law guarantees healthy market competition —
isn't that supposed to be the government's actual job?
208AnonymousOct 8, 2026 15:58
Re: #200
Under a free-market economy, state intervention is supposed to be off-limits
Most Japanese people don't seem to realize it, but bureaucrat-led economic control has continued unbroken since the wartime era
So price controls that don't match the state's own intentions just aren't allowed
The smartphone pricing case is a classic example
216AnonymousOct 8, 2026 16:01
Re: #200,201
These days you can find even domestic beer selling for a borderline insane 1,000+ yen for a 350ml can
If we're going to talk about fair market principles for beer, rationalizing the liquor tax should come first

Background and key points of this story

At the heart of this case is whether the conduct amounts to an “unreasonable restraint of trade” (cartel) banned under the Antimonopoly Act. The Fair Trade Commission is still analyzing seized documents to determine how shipping prices and price hikes were decided — no charges have actually been filed yet. Several commenters argued that “other industries like phones, rice, and gas are just as bad,” but that doesn’t make a cartel any less serious — sharing price lists and coordinating on shipping prices is potentially illegal under antitrust law regardless of industry. Many also linked the light media coverage to the beer industry’s status as a major TV sponsor, but that connection is speculation, not something established as fact in the article.

*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (News Speed+) thread “Big 4 Beer Makers May Have Shared Price Lists — Cartel Suspicions Center on Manager-Level Meetings.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *