From our other sites
The story
A user’s account of sending a Super Chat to their favorite streamer, only to be completely ignored, touched off a debate on 5ch’s Newsspeed VIP board over whether red Super Chats (the top-tier, priciest donation color on YouTube) are shameless. One post dismissed the act of throwing money for “recognition” as pathetic, prompting a counterattack: “If craving recognition is shameless, then posting on this board is no different.” From there the thread spiraled into jabs comparing it to a hostess club, and pointed remarks that “the streamer is the one actually profiting here.” Neither side budged, and the argument never really went anywhere.
What people said
If wanting recognition is shameless, every post on this board is guilty too.
Getting giddy when your favorite says your name and you wanting replies here are the same thing.
I never said wanting recognition is shameless.
I said throwing money at someone just to get noticed is shameless.
At the end of the day it's driven by ulterior motives more than celebration or gratitude.
And I'm not posting here because I want replies either.
Funny how you declare you don't want replies while writing a desperate wall of text.
If you had zero ulterior motives you'd just watch in silence — no money, no posts.
Must be nice, thinking you've won just by saying "hostess club."
You're not even watching the streams, just piling on the mockery — what's the point?
Nobody wins? The streamer sure does. You sound like someone lecturing a donation box — it's hilarious.
You call that a wall of text? I was just explaining myself.
Well, glad you got a laugh out of it.
Fair enough, that's true.
That's not "just explaining," that's just making excuses. Convenient how ending with "fair enough, that's true" makes you feel like you won.
Sounds like you're the one throwing money at streamers.
Throwing out a baseless guess like "sounds like" and calling that a win?
That kind of thinking reeks of someone who throws the most money of all.
Is that so.
Dunno what's got you so worked up, but this isn't going anywhere, so I'll bow out.
That one's programmed to fire back no matter what you write.
Engaging with it is a waste of time.
Even if you're a fool who can't see reality, that doesn't make it okay to make others miserable for money.
Where'd you buy the setting where one line of "not interested" saves everyone?
Throwing a Super Chat or watching one is on the individual — deciding it makes someone else miserable is just your own delusion.
Background and Key Points of This Debate
Super Chat donations get a cut taken by YouTube before the rest goes to the streamer, and whether a message actually gets read out loud is entirely up to the streamer’s discretion — there’s no guarantee it’ll be treated the way the sender hopes. The thread split along one core fault line: is donating money inherently shameless because it’s driven by a craving for recognition, or is posting on a message board just as much an expression of that same craving, only a matter of degree? Both sides kept needling each other without ever finding common ground. Note that the specifics of the original incident — why the Super Chat was ignored, how much was donated, or how the streamer responded — aren’t included in the quoted material and remain unknown. Partway through this back-and-forth, the thread veered off into unrelated chatter, and this piece extracts only the core of the argument, leaving those tangents aside.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Newsspeed VIP) thread “[Image] Result of an Introvert Getting Ignored on His First Red Super Chat Ever.”
Leave a Reply