From our other sites
The story
In a robbery case in which a 79-year-old man suffered serious injuries after being struck in the head with a crowbar, it was reported that the 17-year-old assailant was sent to a juvenile detention center without “gyakuso” — referral to an adult criminal trial. The news drew a wave of reactions on 5ch. Alongside comments criticizing the leniency of the punishment, the discussion also expanded into the rehabilitative effectiveness of juvenile detention centers and generational friction between baby boomers and younger people.
Can such a lenient punishment really stop kids from running wild?… 17-year-old who committed robbery by “striking the victim’s head with a crowbar” sent to juvenile detention without referral for an adult trial — the 79-year-old victim’s thoughts
Mon, 8/24, 6:01 AM — Nikkan Shincho
A painful photo of Mr. A (79), taken just after the incident
Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here
What people said
There was a talk recently about a parent whose daughter was brutally murdered by a high schooler — when they spoke up to the judge about the sentence being only 9 years, the judge just said 'well, that's your personal values' and hurried out of the courtroom.
And then he'll go compete on Breaking Down (a popular amateur fight show), boost his notoriety, and cash in big — that's the whole package these days.
'Want some canned peaches? No? …I see.' (a famously intimidating line from the Be-Bop High School films)
About 'Bop' level (referring to the tougher 'Bop' characters in Be-Bop High School)
Beating someone up is just unforgivable… it's blasphemy against God, seriously nurupo (an old meme that's supposed to be answered with 'Gah!')
Don't even have the energy to pull up the AA (ASCII art) comeback.
When kids commit crimes, it's society's fault — you adults need to get your act together.
Seriously, exactly this — this is what happens when the Ice Age generation (Japan's 'employment ice age' cohort) raises kids.
That's just common sense — if a robber breaks into your house, even killing them won't get you charged with much.
They don't rush to arrest all the yakuza and hangure (semi-organized crime groups) crawling around the cities either — same deal.
You just gotta protect yourself so they don't mess with you lol
The further out into the countryside you go, the more wax-clogged the cops' ears get lol — they can't hear the noise regular citizens can hear. Even in Fussa, Tokyo, none of the cops noticed, right? And they're supposed to live in the same town lol
And the reason those parents raised him wrong is because their own parents raised them wrong — go punish them instead. The parents are victims too.
A 17-year-old isn't paying taxes though.
Basically impossible — both juvenile detention and prison are full of guys one-upping each other over what they did to end up there.
Actually juvenile detention has a higher rehabilitation rate than adult prison — I'm pretty sure the data clearly shows that.
Background and Key Points
Japan’s Juvenile Act treats offenders under 20 (the age was 20 until 2022, when it was lowered to 18, though 18–19-year-olds remain “tokutei shonen” with a modified process) through family courts rather than criminal courts by default. “Gyakuso” (Article 20) is the mechanism by which a family court can hand a case back to prosecutors for adult trial — it is effectively mandatory for intentional homicide committed at 16 or older, but for robbery resulting in injury (goto chishou), which under adult law carries a minimum of six years up to life imprisonment, referral is discretionary. Here, the family court chose institutional treatment at a shonenin (juvenile training school) instead, a placement that in principle runs until age 26 for serious cases but is often exited well before that on review.
The thread’s actual fault line was not really “is this punishment too light” versus “no it isn’t” — nearly everyone agreed the outcome felt inadequate. The split was over what to do about it: some blamed the juvenile system’s design and pushed for harsher, adult-style consequences; others reframed it as a rehabilitation-efficacy question, arguing (post 237) that shonenin recidivism data actually compares favorably to adult prison; and a third thread pivoted into generational blame, tying the offender’s upbringing to the “Employment Ice Age” cohort and to boomers’ share of social-security spending — a tangent with no real connection to the case.
What’s missing from the discussion is the legal standard itself: no poster explained why gyakuso wasn’t triggered, i.e., that Article 20’s near-automatic referral only applies to fatal offenses, not injury cases like this one, which is precisely why the outcome was legally unsurprising rather than an aberration.
*This article is excerpted and summarized from the 5ch (Breaking News+) thread “Can such a lenient punishment really stop kids from running wild?… 17-year-old who “struck the victim’s head with a crowbar” sent to juvenile detention without referral for an adult trial — the 79-year-old victim’s thoughts.”
Leave a Reply