Miki Fujimoto Praised for Saying School Milk Costs Too Much — 5ch Asks: ‘Then Where Do We Get Our Calcium?’

From our other sites

The story

Miki Fujimoto, appearing on Fuji TV’s information show “Mikity Dining,” visited the school lunch program at her husband Tomoharu Shoji’s alma mater and was stunned to learn that milk accounted for ¥73 of the ¥356 per-meal budget, suggesting “couldn’t we just use water instead?” The school nutritionist shot back immediately, “No, that’s not an option” — but her comment won praise on the 5ch forums. Thread posters debated what could replace milk as a calcium source, whether it’s right to force milk on kids with lactose intolerance, and what the move would mean for the dairy industry, splitting into camps over whether milk is an essential part of school lunch or just a fixed cost worth reconsidering.

Miki Fujimoto Stunned by Elementary School Lunch Budget: “Don’t You Just Think, Wouldn’t Water Be Fine?” — Talent Miki Fujimoto (41) and her husband Tomoharu Shoji (50), of the comedy duo Shinagawa Shoji, appeared together on Fuji TV’s “Mikity Dining” (Saturdays, 11 a.m.) on the 10th, sharing their thoughts on elementary school lunch budgets. The episode, a special “Revitalizing Towns Through Food in Kamata” edition, saw the pair visit an elementary school at the request of Shoji’s alma mater to learn about food education.

The two were asked to come up with a new school lunch menu idea. According to the nutritionist, the current lunch budget in Ota Ward for 5th and 6th graders is ¥356 per meal (recently raised by ¥10 thanks to extra ward funding), and that includes one carton of milk at ¥73 (tax included). Hearing the budget, both were taken aback, with Fujimoto remarking, “That’s rough.”

Then, reacting to the price of the milk, she said, “Wait, isn’t that expensive!? You’re telling me that out of the ¥360 you have to work with for the whole lunch, ¥70 goes just to milk? Don’t you start thinking, ‘wouldn’t water be fine?’” The nutritionist calmly replied, “No, that’s not really an option.”

Source: news.yahoo.co.jp / Original article here

What people said

3AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:25
Even if the whole school lunch system disappeared, milk's probably the one thing that'd survive — it's that essential.
6AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:26
If there's another food out there as cheap and nutrient-dense as milk, sure, let's switch to that.
9AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:28
They're dead set on making kids drink milk no matter what.

This has gotta be some US military conspiracy.

There's definitely something weird mixed into it too.
10AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:28
Yeah, considering what's actually in milk nutritionally, you can't just cut it to zero.
18AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:29
Did people drink milk back in the Edo period?
54AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:37
Re: #18
If anything, they'd been drinking it since the Asuka period.
67AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:40
Re: #18
Apparently Ieyasu ate rakugan sweets and cheese for his stomach.
Supposedly he was so into gut health he stuck a finger in his own anus every day.
29AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:31
Okay then, where are you supposed to get your calcium from?
40AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:34
Re: #29
Anchovies.
44AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:34
Re: #29
Yogurt or cheese work fine too, and tofu or fish are okay as well.
39AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:34
It's the other way around.
As long as you're drinking milk you've got most of your nutrition covered.
White rice and natto handle the rest.
Just don't go splurging on fish or meat.
43AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:34
Re: #39
Do that and it looks cheap, and you'll get slammed for it.
42AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:34
Couldn't kids just bring their own drink from home?
58AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:38
Re: #42
They just allowed kids to bring furikake (rice seasoning) from home to cut down on leftover plain rice, and people still lost it screaming 'WAAAAAH! What about nutritional balance?! What about food education?!' This is the kind of country where that'd never fly.
49AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:35
Why not just switch to low-fat milk?
53AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:37
Re: #49
Growing kids don't need to be drinking low-fat milk.
50AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:36
Re: #44
Lol, that'd actually raise the cost.
52AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:37
Re: #50
Tofu would bring the cost down though.
57AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:37
Why not just double the school lunch fee instead?
It'd help protect farmers too, as a bonus.
60AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:38
Re: #57
And of course that gets collected from the parents, right?
59AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:38
Most Japanese people can't actually absorb much calcium from milk anyway.
Nutritionally it's also skewed — more fat than protein, and the mineral balance is off — so it's not really something you can call healthy.
70AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:44
Re: #59
Why are you making up baseless stuff like that?
Even for Japanese people, calcium absorption from milk is around 40%, which is higher than from fish or vegetables.
78AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:47
Re: #70
That's true for about half of Japanese people.
Far from just absorbing it poorly, some people get diarrhea or even develop allergies, so charging everyone for milk isn't a good idea.
79AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:47
Re: #70
Plus it provides the protein and fat that Japanese food tends to fall short on, which suits growing kids, and it's still one of the more cost-effective options.
72AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:45
Back in the Showa era, allergy or not, you ate it, no questions asked.
My wife was the pickiest eater around and they'd make her sit there eating until 6th period if she didn't finish.
Unbelievable.
Turned out as an adult she had a mackerel allergy.
They force-fed her anyway, no questions asked — it's a wonder nobody died.
77AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:47
Re: #72
It was the Showa era — if someone had died, it probably just wouldn't have made the news, right?
73AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:45
To begin with, 10% of Japanese people can't digest milk at all, and 40% can only partially digest it.
Milk just isn't suited to Japanese people.
76AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:46
Re: #73
So true. I had diarrhea pretty much the whole time through elementary and middle school.
80AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:47
Re: #73
Even with lactose intolerance, 200ml of milk shouldn't upset your stomach.
82AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:48
Re: #73
That's just about the lactase enzyme — gut bacteria can break it down too.
If your logic held up, basically everyone in elementary and middle school would've been hit with diarrhea after every lunch.
83AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:48
Re: #80
Depends on the person.
Blindly trusting some vague standard and forcing it on everyone is straight-up outdated Showa-era thinking.
89AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:50
Re: #83
Then just use lactose-free milk, problem solved.
And yogurt's already broken down so it won't upset anyone's stomach either.
92AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:50
Just make it optional — only people who want milk pay for it and drink it.
Forcing it on everyone is basically like the NHK license fee (Japan's mandatory TV broadcast fee).
96AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:51
Re: #92
Why have you been switching IDs this whole time?
102AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:52
Re: #92
Well, the school lunch nutrition standards require getting 50% of a day's calcium from the meal, so that'd fail the standard.
108AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:53
Re: #92
Then just skip the school lunch and bring a packed lunch from home?
99AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:51
What happens to the dairy industry?
104AnonymousOct 11, 2026 13:52
Re: #99
If it's not covered through school lunch, people will just buy it at home instead, so total demand doesn't change.
In other words, no impact.

Background and Key Points of Debate

Milk in school lunches has long been a fixture as a cheap way to secure calcium, with guideline calcium intake levels set under Japan’s School Lunch Act implementation standards. As pointed out in the thread, milk’s calcium absorption rate is said to be higher than that of other foods, but it’s also well known that a certain portion of Japanese people are lactose intolerant. Fujimoto’s remark was a simple observation focused on cost, but actually cutting milk would leave open questions on both the nutritional and industry side — namely, what would replace it as a calcium source and what the impact on the dairy industry would be. The divide in opinions on the thread essentially comes down to whether people see milk as “essential” or as a “fixed cost that can be reconsidered.”

※This article is compiled as an excerpt and summary of the 5ch (Nandemo Jikkyo G) thread “Miki Fujimoto: ‘Of the ¥360 budget for school lunch, ¥70 goes to milk. Why not switch that to water first?’ → Praised“.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *